specification at the sentencing hearing (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

specification at the sentencing hearing in Ohio

8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Wattersgreen
ohioctapp · 1985 · cited in 2 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1990–1991
2 sentences

1991State v. Riggins (1986), 35 Ohio App.3d 1 , 519 N.E.2d 397 ; see, also, State v. Watters (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 186 , 27 OBR 224, 500 N.E.2d 312 .

1991State v. Riggins (1986), 35 Ohio App.3d 1 , 519 N.E.2d 397 ; see, also, State v. Watters (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 186 , 27 OBR 224, 500 N.E.2d 312 .

12
State v. Swigergreen
ohioctapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See State v. Swiger (1987), 34 Ohio App.3d 371 , 518 N.E.2d 972 , which held that if the defendant requests that the trial judge determine the existence of the specification at the sentencing hearing and evidence of a specification of a former conviction is a matter of sentencing, not an element of the offense charged, it is prejudicially erroneous to permit evidence of the specification to go to the jury.

1996See State v. Swiger (1987), 34 Ohio App.3d 371 , 518 N.E.2d 972 , which held that if the defendant requests that the trial judge determine the existence of the specification at the sentencing hearing and evidence of a specification of a former conviction is a matter of sentencing, not an element of the offense charged, it is prejudicially erroneous to permit evidence of the specification to go to the jury.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Arnold green
ohio · 1991
2 sentences

1993This argument ignores our ruling in State v. Arnold, (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 175 , 573 N.E.2d 1079 , in which we stated that the sentencing court “must employ both R.C. 2929.11(B) and the applicable section of Chapter 2925 when determining the penalty for an R.C.

1993This argument ignores our ruling in State v. Arnold, (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 175 , 573 N.E.2d 1079 , in which we stated that the sentencing court “must employ both R.C. 2929.11(B) and the applicable section of Chapter 2925 when determining the penalty for an R.C.

21993–1993
State v. Sheffey green
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2020State v. Sheffey, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98944, 2013-Ohio-2463, ¶ 36 ; Brown v. Reid, 5 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 94384, 2010-Ohio-527 , ¶ 6 (finding no support “for the proposition that R.C. 2929.41(B)(1) requires that the language for consecutive sentences must be made in the sentencing entry for the misdemeanor case”).

12020–2020
State v. Byrd neutral
ohioctapp · 1985
2 sentences

1997“It is apparent that a request for the trial judge to determine the existence of a specification must be made before trial.” 6 State v. Byrd (1985), 26 Ohio App.3d 91, 93 , 26 OBR 266, 267, 498 N.E.2d 217, 219 .

1997“It is apparent that a request for the trial judge to determine the existence of a specification must be made before trial.” 6 State v. Byrd (1985), 26 Ohio App.3d 91, 93 , 26 OBR 266, 267, 498 N.E.2d 217, 219 .

11997–1997
State v. Riggins green
ohioctapp · 1986
2 sentences

1991State v. Riggins (1986), 35 Ohio App.3d 1 , 519 N.E.2d 397 ; see, also, State v. Watters (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 186 , 27 OBR 224, 500 N.E.2d 312 .

1991State v. Riggins (1986), 35 Ohio App.3d 1 , 519 N.E.2d 397 ; see, also, State v. Watters (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 186 , 27 OBR 224, 500 N.E.2d 312 .

11991–1991
State v. Curry green
ohio · 1975
2 sentences

1987State v. Curry (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 66 , 72 O.O. 2d 37, 330 N.E. 2d 720 .

1987State v. Curry (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 66 , 72 O.O. 2d 37, 330 N.E. 2d 720 .

11987–1987

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2941.142 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.11 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2913.02 (3) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.03 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check