expressed rule in Oklahoma

1953Cr. 126 , 201 P. 819 , this court held the disqualification of the juror was waived by withholding and raising it as an objection after the verdict, since such a practice is not consistent with good faith and fair dealing which should characterize the administration of justice.” Had counsel for defendant heeded his own judgment and requested additional peremptory challenges, no doubt the trial court would have granted the same, but instead he acquiesced in the defendant’s expressed waiver óf the statutory right to additional peremptory challenges.

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1949A petition for cer-tiorari in that case was denied by the Supreme Court. 209 U.S. 545 , 28 Sup. Ct. 571, 52 L.Ed. 920 .” In Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co., 147 Wis. 285 , 133 N. W. 142 , the court expressed this rule in the fourth syllabus as follows: “A physical fact, existent as matter of common knowledge or established by evidence beyond room for fair controversy, cannot be overcome by human testimony, opinion or theorizing.” In Schrager v. Foster, 168 N.Y.S. 240 , the court said: “A verdict based on finding directly contrary to physical facts established by uncontradicted evidence cannot st

1943In other words, the party who first elicits information from an incompetent witness cannot complain of a similar inquiry on cross-examination or redirect examination by his adversary.” And the court expressed the rule, as follows: “A party to litigation, who elicits information. concerning transactions or *345 communications with a deceased person from a witness incompetent to testify as to the same, cannot thereafter successfully object to his adversary pursuing the same line of inquiry on cross-examination or redirect examination of the same witness.” See, also, Hinds v. Atlas Acceptance Cor

1943In other words, the party who first elicits information from an incompetent witness cannot complain of a similar inquiry on cross-examination or redirect examination by his adversary.” And the court expressed the rule, as follows: “A party to litigation, who elicits information. concerning transactions or *345 communications with a deceased person from a witness incompetent to testify as to the same, cannot thereafter successfully object to his adversary pursuing the same line of inquiry on cross-examination or redirect examination of the same witness.” See, also, Hinds v. Atlas Acceptance Cor

1942It reads as follows: “A proposition attempting to refer to the qualified property taxpaying voters of a city whether said city shall be allowed to become indebted for the purchase, construction, or repair of public utilities under section 27, art. 10, of the Constitution, must be stated in such specific language as to apprise the voters of the nature of the public utility the city wishes to purchase, construct, or repair.” And to similar effect is the holding in the Ryan Case, above, as follows: “To obtain the authority of the qualified voters to incur an indebtedness, or to enter into a contr

1942In Coleman v. Frame, 26 Okla. 193 , 109 P. 928 , the court expressed a rule which is of some value here as a guide.

1942In Coleman v. Frame, 26 Okla. 193 , 109 P. 928 , the court expressed a rule which is of some value here as a guide.

1936Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 P. 969 ; State v. Fletcher, 168 Okla. 538 , 34 P. (2d) 595 .

1936Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 P. 969 ; State v. Fletcher, 168 Okla. 538 , 34 P. (2d) 595 .

1936Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 P. 969 ; State v. Fletcher, 168 Okla. 538 , 34 P. (2d) 595 .

1936Oklahoma News Co. v. Ryan, 101 Okla. 151 , 224 P. 969 ; State v. Fletcher, 168 Okla. 538 , 34 P. (2d) 595 .

1929S. 1921, and the statutes in support thereof would afford the plaintiff full, speedy, complete and adequate relief; and there are. no allegations in the petition showing that such remedy is then unavailable, the court rightfully sustained a demurrer to said petition based on the insufficiency of the petition.” And, in the case, of Miller v. White, 129 Okla. 184 , 265 Pac. 646 , this court expressed the principle applicable to the case under consideration in the following language: “Subdivisions 4 and 7 of section 810, C.

1929S. 1921, and the statutes in support thereof would afford the plaintiff full, speedy, complete and adequate relief; and there are. no allegations in the petition showing that such remedy is then unavailable, the court rightfully sustained a demurrer to said petition based on the insufficiency of the petition.” And, in the case, of Miller v. White, 129 Okla. 184 , 265 Pac. 646 , this court expressed the principle applicable to the case under consideration in the following language: “Subdivisions 4 and 7 of section 810, C.