judgment despite evidentiary error (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

judgment despite evidentiary error in Oregon

8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Davisgreen
or · 2003 · cited in 6 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2008–2025
2 sentences

2025See State v. Davis, 336 Or 19, 32 , 77 P3d 1111 (2003) (explaining that we will affirm the judgment despite evidentiary error if there was “little likelihood that the error affected the jury’s verdict”).

2025See State v. Davis, 336 Or 19, 32 , 77 P3d 1111 (2003) (explaining that we will affirm the judgment despite evidentiary error if there was “little likelihood that the error affected the jury’s verdict”).

26

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Dunning green
orctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2017“We will *** affirm a judgment despite evidentiary error if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.” State v. Dunning, 245 Or App 582, 591 , 263 P3d 372 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted).

2017“We will *** affirm a judgment despite evidentiary error if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.” State v. Dunning, 245 Or App 582, 591 , 263 P3d 372 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted).

12017–2017
State v. Olsen green
orctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2012“We will affirm a judgment despite evidentiary error if admitting the evidence is harmless.” Olsen, 220 Or App at 89 .

12012–2012

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check