Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2024However, such evidence is, of course, not dispositive of the earning power inquiry.” Id. at 846 . 2020Rather, while evidence regarding a claimant’s efforts to procure one of the identified jobs is relevant to rebutting the positions as proof of claimant’s earning power, such evidence is “not dispositive of the earning power inquiry.” Phoenixville, 81 A.3d at 846 ; accord Valenta, 176 A.3d at 383 . | 1 | 5 |
Valenta v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2020Rather, while evidence regarding a claimant’s efforts to procure one of the identified jobs is relevant to rebutting the positions as proof of claimant’s earning power, such evidence is “not dispositive of the earning power inquiry.” Phoenixville, 81 A.3d at 846 ; accord Valenta, 176 A.3d at 383 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Supervalu Holdings PA, LLC)
green
1 sentence2020Recently, in Smith, we considered the issue of whether the employer met its burden of proving that the jobs remained “open and available,” and whether the WCJ improperly shifted the burden to the claimant to prove that the positions were not available. 177 A.3d at 401-402 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2014The history of the notice requirement is as follows: The introduction of the earning power analysis was prompted by a desire to replace the Kachinski [v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987)] regime, along with its highly technical requirements, with a more efficient and less expensive form of partial disability determination. 2014The history of the notice requirement is as follows: The introduction of the earning power analysis was prompted by a desire to replace the Kachinski [v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987)] regime, along with its highly technical requirements, with a more efficient and less expensive form of partial disability determination. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Commonwealth ex rel. Kallen v. Kallen
green
2 sentences1972Kallen v. Kallen, 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 507 , 190 A.2d 175 (1963); Commonwealth ex rel. 1972Kallen v. Kallen, 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 507 , 190 A.2d 175 (1963); Commonwealth ex rel. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.