Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1962–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Wallsgreen1 sentence2016Commonwealth v. Wall, [] 926 A.2d 957, 961 (Pa.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.green2 sentences1986Order Now, December 5, 1986, the order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission in the above-captioned matter dated November 27, 1985 is hereby reversed. 1 Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, as amended, 43 P.S. §955. 2 See Section 9 of the Act, 43 P.S. §959. 3 See id. 4 For an excellent analysis of the distinctions between disparate impact discrimination and disparate treatment discrimination, only the latter of which requires the complainant to demonstrate intent, see Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 506 Pa. 138, 147 , 484 A.2d 392, 397 (1984) (Larsen, J., opinion in support of affir 1986Order Now, December 5, 1986, the order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission in the above-captioned matter dated November 27, 1985 is hereby reversed. 1 Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, as amended, 43 P.S. §955. 2 See Section 9 of the Act, 43 P.S. §959. 3 See id. 4 For an excellent analysis of the distinctions between disparate impact discrimination and disparate treatment discrimination, only the latter of which requires the complainant to demonstrate intent, see Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 506 Pa. 138, 147 , 484 A.2d 392, 397 (1984) (Larsen, J., opinion in support of affir | 1 | 1 |
Pierce v. Allegheny Bessemer Steel Co.green1 sentence1969For an excellent analysis of the policy behind this provision, see Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 70, 75 , 39 A. 20 534 (1944). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Burkettgreen2 sentences1968See the excellent analysis of this issue contained in Judge Hoffman’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Burkett, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 299, 305 , 235 A. 2d 161, 163 (1967) (concurring opinion); see also Miranda v. Arizona, supra at 477, 479, 86 S. Ct. at 1629, 1630 . 1968See the excellent analysis of this issue contained in Judge Hoffman’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Burkett, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 299, 305 , 235 A. 2d 161, 163 (1967) (concurring opinion); see also Miranda v. Arizona, supra at 477, 479, 86 S. Ct. at 1629, 1630 . | 1 | 1 |
Miranda v. Arizonagreen1 sentence1968See the excellent analysis of this issue contained in Judge Hoffman’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Burkett, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 299, 305 , 235 A. 2d 161, 163 (1967) (concurring opinion); see also Miranda v. Arizona, supra at 477, 479, 86 S. Ct. at 1629, 1630 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gottlieb v. Zoning Hearing Board
green
2 sentences1977In Gottlieb v. Zoning Hearing Board, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 365 , 349 A.2d 61 (1975), Judge Blatt conducted an excellent analysis of Pysdrowski and similar eases 6 which serves to distinguish the present case. 1977In Gottlieb v. Zoning Hearing Board, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 365 , 349 A.2d 61 (1975), Judge Blatt conducted an excellent analysis of Pysdrowski and similar eases 6 which serves to distinguish the present case. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Keystone Diesel E. Co., Inc. v. Irwin
green
1 sentence1974We agree with defendant’s argument that, with very rare exceptions, punitive damages are not allowable in actions for breach of contract: Keystone Diesel Engine Co. v. Irwin, 411 Pa. 222 (1963); Hoy v. Gronoble, 34 Pa. 9 (1859); Krapta v. Yelen, 42 Luz. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Hoy v. Gronoble
green
1 sentence1974We agree with defendant’s argument that, with very rare exceptions, punitive damages are not allowable in actions for breach of contract: Keystone Diesel Engine Co. v. Irwin, 411 Pa. 222 (1963); Hoy v. Gronoble, 34 Pa. 9 (1859); Krapta v. Yelen, 42 Luz. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works
green
1 sentence1969For an excellent analysis of the policy behind this provision, see Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 70, 75 , 39 A. 20 534 (1944). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Noonan, Inc. v. Hoff
green
1 sentence1962For an excellent analysis of the distinction between a warrant authorizing the prothonotary to enter judgment under the Act of 1806, and the common law confession of judgment, see Mr. Justice (later Chief Justice) Horace Stern’s opinion Noonan, Inc. v. Hoff, 350 Pa. 295, 298-299 , 38 A. 2d 53 (1944), and Shuchman, Penna. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Noonan, Inc. v. Hoff
green
1 sentence1962For an excellent analysis of the distinction between a warrant authorizing the prothonotary to enter judgment under the Act of 1806, and the common law confession of judgment, see Mr. Justice (later Chief Justice) Horace Stern’s opinion Noonan, Inc. v. Hoff, 350 Pa. 295, 298-299 , 38 A. 2d 53 (1944), and Shuchman, Penna. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.