Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Romerogreen2 sentences2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). 2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). | 5 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Hughesgreen2 sentences2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). 2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Bondgreen2 sentences2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). 2014Commonwealth v. Simpson, 620 Pa. 60 , 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n. 27 (2013); Commonwealth v. Bond, 604 Pa. 1 , 985 A.2d 810, 824 (2009); Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hughes, 581 Pa. 274 , 865 A.2d 761, 815 (2004). | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Simpsongreen2 sentences2020See Commonwealth v. Hannibal, 156 A.3d 197, 230 (Pa. 2016). “[T]here is no constitutional right to an individual sentencing hearing, merely an individualized sentence, and where a defendant does not show he is prejudiced by a joint sentencing hearing we will not find a due process violation.” Commonwealth v. Simpson, 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n.27 (Pa. 2013). 2020See Commonwealth v. Hannibal, 156 A.3d 197, 230 (Pa. 2016). “[T]here is no constitutional right to an individual sentencing hearing, merely an individualized sentence, and where a defendant does not show he is prejudiced by a joint sentencing hearing we will not find a due process violation.” Commonwealth v. Simpson, 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n.27 (Pa. 2013). - 24 - Appellant contends that his January 4, 2018 resentencing hearing “was not done by a neutral and detached hearing body” because it was conducted at the same time as Farrell’s sentencing hearing. | 2 | 6 |
Commonwealth v. Hannibal, S., Aplt.green2 sentences2020See Commonwealth v. Hannibal, 156 A.3d 197, 230 (Pa. 2016). “[T]here is no constitutional right to an individual sentencing hearing, merely an individualized sentence, and where a defendant does not show he is prejudiced by a joint sentencing hearing we will not find a due process violation.” Commonwealth v. Simpson, 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n.27 (Pa. 2013). 2020See Commonwealth v. Hannibal, 156 A.3d 197, 230 (Pa. 2016). “[T]here is no constitutional right to an individual sentencing hearing, merely an individualized sentence, and where a defendant does not show he is prejudiced by a joint sentencing hearing we will not find a due process violation.” Commonwealth v. Simpson, 66 A.3d 253 , 275 n.27 (Pa. 2013). - 24 - Appellant contends that his January 4, 2018 resentencing hearing “was not done by a neutral and detached hearing body” because it was conducted at the same time as Farrell’s sentencing hearing. | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2013Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275, 307-08 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007), rev'd on other grounds, Commonwealth v. (Kenneth) Williams, 597 Pa. 109, 126, n. 6 , 950 A.2d 294, 304, n. 6 (2008). 2013Commonwealth v. Romero, 595 Pa. 275, 307-08 , 938 A.2d 362, 381 (2007), rev'd on other grounds, Commonwealth v. (Kenneth) Williams, 597 Pa. 109, 126, n. 6 , 950 A.2d 294, 304, n. 6 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.