Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water Authgreen2 sentences2018This requirement had no basis in the language of the statutory exception.6 As with Love’s extra-textual narrowing of the vehicle liability exception, Mascaro “embodied an imprudent departure from the letter of the [statutory] exception in pursuit of its spirit in violation of our rules of construction.” Balentine, 191 A.3d at 815 (Wecht, J., concurring). 2018This requirement had no basis in the language of the statutory exception. 6 As with Love 's extra-textual narrowing of the vehicle liability exception, Mascaro "embodied an imprudent departure from the letter of the [statutory] exception in pursuit of its spirit in violation of our rules of construction." Balentine , 191 A.3d at 815 (Wecht, J., concurring). | 2 | 2 |
Grieff v. Reisingergreen2 sentences2018The Majority notes that this Court has limited Mascaro 's scope, observing charitably that we "clarified its import." Majority Op. at 360 (citing Crowell v. City of Phila. , 531 Pa. 400 , 613 A.2d 1178 , 1183-85 (1992) (concluding that Mascaro does not preclude recovery on the basis of governmental immunity to claims of joint liability where the government's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm); and Grieff v. Reisinger , 548 Pa. 13 , 693 A.2d 195 , 197 (1997) (reiterating that Mascaro was intended to apply only to cases in which a third party causes the harm) ). 7 While dip 2018The Majority notes that this Court has limited Mascaro 's scope, observing charitably that we "clarified its import." Majority Op. at 360 (citing Crowell v. City of Phila. , 531 Pa. 400 , 613 A.2d 1178 , 1183-85 (1992) (concluding that Mascaro does not preclude recovery on the basis of governmental immunity to claims of joint liability where the government's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm); and Grieff v. Reisinger , 548 Pa. 13 , 693 A.2d 195 , 197 (1997) (reiterating that Mascaro was intended to apply only to cases in which a third party causes the harm) ). 7 While dip | 1 | 2 |
Crowell v. City of Philadelphiagreen2 sentences2018The Majority notes that this Court has limited Mascaro 's scope, observing charitably that we "clarified its import." Majority Op. at 360 (citing Crowell v. City of Phila. , 531 Pa. 400 , 613 A.2d 1178 , 1183-85 (1992) (concluding that Mascaro does not preclude recovery on the basis of governmental immunity to claims of joint liability where the government's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm); and Grieff v. Reisinger , 548 Pa. 13 , 693 A.2d 195 , 197 (1997) (reiterating that Mascaro was intended to apply only to cases in which a third party causes the harm) ). 7 While dip 2018The Majority notes that this Court has limited Mascaro 's scope, observing charitably that we "clarified its import." Majority Op. at 360 (citing Crowell v. City of Phila. , 531 Pa. 400 , 613 A.2d 1178 , 1183-85 (1992) (concluding that Mascaro does not preclude recovery on the basis of governmental immunity to claims of joint liability where the government's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm); and Grieff v. Reisinger , 548 Pa. 13 , 693 A.2d 195 , 197 (1997) (reiterating that Mascaro was intended to apply only to cases in which a third party causes the harm) ). 7 While dip | 1 | 2 |
Finn v. City of Philadelphiagreen2 sentences1998Id. at 605 , 664 A.2d at 1346 (emphasis added). 1998Id. at 605 , 664 A.2d at 1346 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hughesgreen2 sentences1985Compare Commonwealth v. Hughes, 268 Pa. Super. 536, 546 , 408 A.2d 1132 (1979). 1985Compare Commonwealth v. Hughes, 268 Pa. Super. 536, 546 , 408 A.2d 1132 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer
red
2 sentences1986Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer, supra, at 500 Pa. [16] 46-50, 454 A.2d 937 .” Id., 504 Pa. at 437, 475 A.2d at 704. 1986Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer, supra, at 500 Pa. [16] 46-50, 454 A.2d 937 .” Id., 504 Pa. at 437, 475 A.2d at 704. | 2 | 1984–1986 |
Snyder v. Harmon
green
2 sentences2001Id. 2001Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
KILEY BY KILEY v. City of Philadelphia
green
2 sentences1998Id. at 605 , 664 A.2d at 1346 (emphasis added). 1998Id. at 605 , 664 A.2d at 1346 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Frey v. Francis
green
2 sentences1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that ". . . deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. 1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that "... deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cox v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that "... deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. 1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that "... deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Commonwealth v. Frey
green
2 sentences1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that "... deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. 1986This Court has previously addressed this identical issue in Commonwealth v. Frey, 504 Pa. 428 , 475 A.2d 700 (1984), cert. den., 469 U.S. 963 , 105 S.Ct. 360 , 83 L.Ed.2d 296 , and held that "... deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately, and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Commonwealth v. Lesher
green
2 sentences1984Commonwealth v. Lesher, 473 Pa. 141 , 373 A.2d 1088 (1977) (court free to use its own form of expression; only issue is whether area is adequately, accurately and clearly presented to jury).” A deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. 1984Commonwealth v. Lesher, 473 Pa. 141 , 373 A.2d 1088 (1977) (court free to use its own form of expression; only issue is whether area is adequately, accurately and clearly presented to jury).” A deviation from the language of the statutory instruction or a technical inaccuracy in the jury instruction which nevertheless adequately, accurately and clearly expresses the law to the jury will not invalidate a sentence of death. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.