Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2015–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Acker v. Spanglergreen1 sentence2026See Acker v. Spangler, 500 A.2d 206 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1985) (Tort Claims Act does not bar a cause of action against school employee in his individual capacity for willful tortious conduct); Justice v. Lombardo, 208 A.3d 1057 (Pa. 2019) (a trooper acting outside the scope of his employment is not able to benefit from the protections of sovereign immunity). | 1 | 1 |
Galette, C. v. NJ Transitgreen1 sentence2026On July 8, 2024, NJTC filed [p]reliminary [o]bjections to Kim’s [c]omplaint, arguing that [the trial c]ourt lacked subject matter jurisdiction over NJTC by virtue of NJTC’s sovereign immunity [under the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States]. [The trial c]ourt relied on [this Court’s] March 21, 2023[] decision in Galette v. NJ Transit, which provided that NJTC[2] is not an arm of the State of New Jersey[] and thus not entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity. 293 A.3d 649, 658 (Pa. Super. 2023). | 1 | 1 |
Goldman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authoritygreen2 sentences2023See Goldman, supra at 1185 . 2023See Goldman, supra at 1185. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Justice, S., Aplt. v. Trooper Lombardo
green
2 sentences2026See Acker v. Spangler, 500 A.2d 206 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1985) (Tort Claims Act does not bar a cause of action against school employee in his individual capacity for willful tortious conduct); Justice v. Lombardo, 208 A.3d 1057 (Pa. 2019) (a trooper acting outside the scope of his employment is not able to benefit from the protections of sovereign immunity). 2023Given these principles, Detectives, as employees of SEPTA, “are entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity for conduct within the scope of their duties, subject only to certain exceptions not applicable here.” Justice, 208 A.3d at 1067 . | 2 | 2023–2026 |
La Frankie v. Miklich
green
2 sentences2019In the present case, it is undisputed that Trooper Lombardo, as an employee of the PSP, is entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity for conduct within the scope of his duties, subject only to certain exceptions not applicable here. 10 See 1 Pa.C.S. § 2310 ; see also 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8521, 8522(b)(1)-(9) ; La Frankie , 618 A.2d at 1149 . 2019In the present case, it is undisputed that Trooper Lombardo, as an employee of the PSP, is entitled to the protections of sovereign immunity for conduct within the scope of his duties, subject only to certain exceptions not applicable here.10 See 1 Pa.C.S. § 2310; see also 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8521, 8522(b)(1)–(9); La Frankie, 618 A.2d at 1149 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Scientific Games International, Inc. v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2017Justice Wecht cites to two such cases: Games Int'l, Inc. v. Com., 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013) and Mullin v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Trans., 870 A.2d 773 (Pa. 2005).3 The Concurrence cites to no Pennsylvania case, however, holding that sovereign immunity protects its holder from the “financial and temporal costs of litigation” in cases where the doctrine does not provide its holder with immunity from suit. 3 The Concurrence also cites to a Commonwealth Court decision, Stackhouse v. Com., Pennsylvania State Police, 892 A.2d 54 (Pa. Commw. 2006), that involved a request for declaratory relief. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Mullin v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
green
1 sentence2017Justice Wecht cites to two such cases: Games Int'l, Inc. v. Com., 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013) and Mullin v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Trans., 870 A.2d 773 (Pa. 2005).3 The Concurrence cites to no Pennsylvania case, however, holding that sovereign immunity protects its holder from the “financial and temporal costs of litigation” in cases where the doctrine does not provide its holder with immunity from suit. 3 The Concurrence also cites to a Commonwealth Court decision, Stackhouse v. Com., Pennsylvania State Police, 892 A.2d 54 (Pa. Commw. 2006), that involved a request for declaratory relief. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State Police
green
1 sentence2017Justice Wecht cites to two such cases: Games Int'l, Inc. v. Com., 66 A.3d 740 (Pa. 2013) and Mullin v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Trans., 870 A.2d 773 (Pa. 2005).3 The Concurrence cites to no Pennsylvania case, however, holding that sovereign immunity protects its holder from the “financial and temporal costs of litigation” in cases where the doctrine does not provide its holder with immunity from suit. 3 The Concurrence also cites to a Commonwealth Court decision, Stackhouse v. Com., Pennsylvania State Police, 892 A.2d 54 (Pa. Commw. 2006), that involved a request for declaratory relief. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
WILKINSBURG POLICE OFFICERS v. Com.
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Pyeritz v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2015(C.R. at 84-85.) In doing so, the trial court relied upon Pyeritz v. Commonwealth, 32 A.3d 687 (Pa. 2011), in stating that the “personal property exception only allows suit against the Commonwealth for negligence when the property itself causes physical injury.” (C.R. at 84 (quoting Pyeritz, 32 A.3d at 696 ) (Eakin, J., concurring).) The trial court also reasoned that Payne had not pled how he and Appellees entered into a contract to satisfy his assumpsit claim. 2015(C.R. at 84-85.) In doing so, the trial court relied upon Pyeritz v. Commonwealth, 32 A.3d 687 (Pa. 2011), in stating that the “personal property exception only allows suit against the Commonwealth for negligence when the property itself causes physical injury.” (C.R. at 84 (quoting Pyeritz, 32 A.3d at 696 ) (Eakin, J., concurring).) The trial court also reasoned that Payne had not pled how he and Appellees entered into a contract to satisfy his assumpsit claim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.