technician who performed test (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

technician who performed test in Pennsylvania

7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Commonwealth v. Karchgreen
pa · 1986 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1988–2004
2 sentences

2004For example, in Commonwealth v. Karch, 349 Pa.Super. 227 , 502 A.2d 1359 (1986), appellant, following his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, argued that the results of his blood alcohol test were inadmissible unless the technician who performed the test was called to testify.

2004For example, in Commonwealth v. Karch, 349 Pa.Super. 227 , 502 A.2d 1359 (1986), appellant, following his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, argued that the results of his blood alcohol test were inadmissible unless the technician who performed the test was called to testify.

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Seville green
pasuperct · 1979
2 sentences

1989In Commonwealth v. Seville, [ 266 Pa.Super. 587, 405 A.2d 1262 (1979) ], a case directly on point with the one sub judice, the Court held that blood-alcohol test results were properly admitted into evidence without the presence of the technician who performed the test.

1989In Commonwealth v. Seville, [ 266 Pa.Super. 587, 405 A.2d 1262 (1979) ], a case directly on point with the one sub judice, the Court held that blood-alcohol test results were properly admitted into evidence without the presence of the technician who performed the test.

31988–1989
Commonwealth v. Yohe green
pasuperct · 2012
1 sentence

2013Id. at 387 .

12013–2013
Commonwealth v. O'Hayer green
pa · 1985
2 sentences

2002A clinical laboratory technologist shall have the following qualifications: (1) A baccalaureate degree in medical technology or in chemical, physical or biological science and clinical education in a program accredited by an agency recognized by the Department which includes 1 year of experience acceptable to the Department. (2) An individual without the baccalaureate degree may become qualified as a technologist according to the provisions of section 241 of Title XI of the Social Security Amendments of 1972 Public Law 92-603 (42 U.S.C.A. § 1320a~s). (b) Technical Personnel below the level of

2002A clinical laboratory technologist shall have the following qualifications: (1) A baccalaureate degree in medical technology or in chemical, physical or biological science and clinical education in a program accredited by an agency recognized by the Department which includes 1 year of experience acceptable to the Department. (2) An individual without the baccalaureate degree may become qualified as a technologist according to the provisions of section 241 of Title XI of the Social Security Amendments of 1972 Public Law 92-603 (42 U.S.C.A. § 1320a~s). (b) Technical Personnel below the level of

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

PA 7 (1988–2013) FL 5 (1985–2013) TN 2 (2010–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check