foreclosure hearing (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

foreclosure hearing in South Carolina

7 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Barnes v. Charleston W.C. Ry. Co.green
sc · 1916 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023Barnes v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. follows the same reasoning. 106 S.C. 227 , 230, 90 S.E. 1017, 1018 (1916) (noting the defendant denied the plaintiff's allegations but did not comply with the statutory procedure and did not offer any testimony at the foreclosure hearing).

2023Barnes v. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. follows the same reasoning. 106 S.C. 227 , 230, 90 S.E. 1017, 1018 (1916) (noting the defendant denied the plaintiff's allegations but did not comply with the statutory procedure and did not offer any testimony at the foreclosure hearing).

11
Wilder Corp. v. Wilkegreen
sc · 1998 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76 , 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the [master] to be preserved for appellate review.").

2019See Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76 , 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the [master] to be preserved for appellate review.").

11
Garris v. GOV. BD. OF SC REINSURANCEgreen
sc · 1998 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018Id. ; see also Garris , 333 S.C. at 447 -48 , 511 S.E.2d at 56 (finding the conduct and structure of an agency hearing "was so inherently flawed that it is not subject to harmless error analysis").

2018Id. ; see also Garris , 333 S.C. at 447 -48 , 511 S.E.2d at 56 (finding the conduct and structure of an agency hearing "was so inherently flawed that it is not subject to harmless error analysis").

11
Herron v. CENTURY BMWgreen
sc · 2011 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012As to both of Toney's arguments, we affirm1 pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465 , 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2011) ("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); SSI Med.

2012As to both of Toney's arguments, we affirm1 pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465 , 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2011) ("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); SSI Med.

11
Alford v. Martingreen
· 1935 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012This reasoning traces its roots to the case of Alford v. Martin, in which our supreme court explained that “[t]he character of an action is determined by the complaint in its main purpose and broad outlines and not merely by allegations that are merely incidental.” 176 S.C. 207, 212 , 180 S.E. 13, 15 (1935).

2012This reasoning traces its roots to the case of Alford v. Martin, in which our supreme court explained that “[t]he character of an action is determined by the complaint in its main purpose and broad outlines and not merely by allegations that are merely incidental.” 176 S.C. 207, 212 , 180 S.E. 13, 15 (1935).

11
Fickling v. City of Charlestongreen
scctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007Counsel stated the amount requested for the mechanic’s lien was “not included in the judgment by default [BPD] received on the breach of contract issue.” [3] See Fickling v. City of Charleston , 372 S.C. 597, 601 , 643 S.E.2d 110, 112 (Ct. App. 2007) (stating a trial court’s ruling on an issue becomes the law of the case where the appellant fails to take exception to it both before the trial court and on appeal). [4] The notice of appeal challenges three orders issued by the master regarding BPD’s claim for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

2007Counsel stated the amount requested for the mechanic’s lien was “not included in the judgment by default [BPD] received on the breach of contract issue.” [3] See Fickling v. City of Charleston , 372 S.C. 597, 601 , 643 S.E.2d 110, 112 (Ct. App. 2007) (stating a trial court’s ruling on an issue becomes the law of the case where the appellant fails to take exception to it both before the trial court and on appeal). [4] The notice of appeal challenges three orders issued by the master regarding BPD’s claim for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

11
Mobley v. Bland & Pennsylvania Casualty Co.green
sc · 1942 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See Mobley v. Bland, 200 S.C. 448, 459 , 21 S.E. (2d) 22, 26 (1942) (to have jurisdiction over the entire case, the court must have both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction); 21 C.J.S.

1993See Mobley v. Bland, 200 S.C. 448, 459 , 21 S.E. (2d) 22, 26 (1942) (to have jurisdiction over the entire case, the court must have both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction); 21 C.J.S.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASS'N v. Davidson green
sc · 2009
1 sentence

2018Id. ; see also Garris , 333 S.C. at 447 -48 , 511 S.E.2d at 56 (finding the conduct and structure of an agency hearing "was so inherently flawed that it is not subject to harmless error analysis").

12018–2018

Where else courts name it

IL 17 (1967–2025) CT 14 (1991–2021) ME 13 (2013–2026) NY 13 (1986–2025) FL 12 (2006–2026) NC 11 (1994–2017) MI 9 (1996–2025) OH 8 (2013–2026) SC 7 (1993–2023) GA 6 (1974–2013) VT 6 (1908–2024) CA 6 (2013–2025) TX 6 (1995–2024) NM 5 (2006–2020) WI 5 (2013–2019) OR 4 (1988–2018) IN 4 (1978–2020) VI 3 (2013–2016) RI 3 (2003–2020) HI 3 (2023–2024) ND 2 (1962–1989) MD 2 (2000–2001) AL 2 (1993–2023) MT 2 (1911–1949) NJ 2 (2018–2020) SD 2 (1904–1931) MO 2 (1984–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check