Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1922–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bagwell v. Hintongreen2 sentences1997In Nunnery , this Court explicated the doctrine with certitude: Our Supreme Court in Bagwell v. Hinton, 205 S.C. 377, 400 , 32 S.E.2d 147, 156 (1944), held that the following elements must be shown in order to establish the plea of res judicata: (1) The parties must be the same or their privies; (2) the subject matter must be the same; and (3) while generally the precise point must be ruled, yet where the parties are the same or are in privity the judgment is an absolute bar not only of what was decided but of what might have been decided. 1997In Nunnery , this Court explicated the doctrine with certitude: Our Supreme Court in Bagwell v. Hinton, 205 S.C. 377, 400 , 32 S.E.2d 147, 156 (1944), held that the following elements must be shown in order to establish the plea of res judicata: (1) The parties must be the same or their privies; (2) the subject matter must be the same; and (3) while generally the precise point must be ruled, yet where the parties are the same or are in privity the judgment is an absolute bar not only of what was decided but of what might have been decided. | 2 | 5 |
Nunnery v. Brantley Construction Co., Inc.green2 sentences2006Co. , 289 S.C. 205, 209 , 345 S.E.2d 740, 742-43 (Ct. App. 1986) (stating the following elements must be shown in order to establish the plea of res judicata: (1) The parties must be the same or their privies; (2) the subject matter must be the same; and (3) while generally the precise point must be ruled upon, yet where the parties are the same or are in privity the judgment is an absolute bar not only of what was decided but of what might have been decided). 2006Co. , 289 S.C. 205, 209 , 345 S.E.2d 740, 742-43 (Ct. App. 1986) (stating the following elements must be shown in order to establish the plea of res judicata: (1) The parties must be the same or their privies; (2) the subject matter must be the same; and (3) while generally the precise point must be ruled upon, yet where the parties are the same or are in privity the judgment is an absolute bar not only of what was decided but of what might have been decided). | 1 | 2 |
Johns v. Johnsgreen2 sentences2006Even when the defendant meets all of the required elements, res judicata will not be applied “where it will contravene other important public policies; the courts must weigh the competing public policies.” Johns v. Johns , 309 S.C. 199, 203 , 420 S.E.2d 856, 859 (Ct. App. 1992). 2006Even when the defendant meets all of the required elements, res judicata will not be applied “where it will contravene other important public policies; the courts must weigh the competing public policies.” Johns v. Johns , 309 S.C. 199, 203 , 420 S.E.2d 856, 859 (Ct. App. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Ford v. Watsongreen2 sentences1986See also Ford v. Watson , 282 S.C. 66 , 316 S.E. (2d) 429 (Ct. App. 1984). 1986See also Ford v. Watson , 282 S.C. 66 , 316 S.E. (2d) 429 (Ct. App. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MacKey v. Frazier
green
2 sentences1961Mackey v. Frazier , 234 S.C. 81 , 106 S.E. (2d) 895 . 1961Mackey v. Frazier , 234 S.C. 81 , 106 S.E. (2d) 895 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Johnston-Crews Co. v. Folk
green
1 sentence1945In the very recent case of Bagwell v. Hinton, 205 S. C., 377, 32 S. E. (2d), 147, 156 , it was said: “Before the defense of res judicata is made good, the following elements must be shown: (1) The parties must be the same or their privies; (2) the subject-matter must be the same; and (3) while generally the precise point must be ruled, yet where the parties are the same or are in privity the judgment is an absolute bar not only of what was decided but of what might have been decided.” The leading case of Johnson-Crews Company v. Folk, 118 S. C., 470, 111 S. E., 15, 17 , states that “the follow | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Davis v. Town of West Greenville
green
1 sentence1942Ass’n v. City of Spartanburg, 185 S. C., 313, 194 S. E., 139 ; Davis v. Town of West Greenville, 147 S. C., 448, 145 S. E., 193 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. City of Spartanburg
green
1 sentence1942Ass’n v. City of Spartanburg, 185 S. C., 313, 194 S. E., 139 ; Davis v. Town of West Greenville, 147 S. C., 448, 145 S. E., 193 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
green
2 sentences1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. 1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Radford v. Myers
green
2 sentences1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. 1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven
green
2 sentences1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. 1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Bates v. Bodie
green
2 sentences1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. 1922If the second action was upon a different claim or demand, then the judgment *Page 483 is an estoppel `only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.'" Bates v. Bodie , 245 U.S. 520 ; 38 Sup. Ct., 182 ; 62 L.Ed., 444 ; L.R.A., 1918C, 355; V-C Co. v. Kirven , 215 U.S. 252 ; 30 Sup. Ct., 78 ; 54 L.Ed., 179 ; Troxwll v. Railroad Co. , 227 U.S. 434 ; 33 Sup. Ct., 274 ; 57 L.Ed., 586 ; Radford v. Myers , 231 U.S. 725 ; 34 Sup. Ct., 249 ; 58 L.Ed., 454 ; Hart v. R. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.