7 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dunn v. Dunngreen2 sentences2024See Dunn v. Dunn, 298 S.C. 499, 502 , 381 S.E.2d 734, 735 (1989) (explaining a trial court's ruling on a discovery matter "will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion"); id. ("The burden is upon the party appealing from the order to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion."). 2024See Dunn v. Dunn, 298 S.C. 499, 502 , 381 S.E.2d 734, 735 (1989) (explaining a trial court's ruling on a discovery matter "will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion"); id. ("The burden is upon the party appealing from the order to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion."). | 1 | 1 |
Welch v. Epsteingreen2 sentences2016See Welch v. Epstein, 342 S.C. 279, 299 , 536 S.E.2d 408, 418 (Ct.App.2000) (“When reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict or JNOV, this Court must employ the same standard as the trial court by viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”). 2016See Welch v. Epstein, 342 S.C. 279, 299 , 536 S.E.2d 408, 418 (Ct.App.2000) (“When reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict or JNOV, this Court must employ the same standard as the trial court by viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”). | 1 | 1 |
Wiggins v. Edwardsgreen2 sentences2010Code Ann. §15-78-110 (2005) ("[A]ny action brought pursuant to [the Tort Claims Act] is forever barred unless an action is commenced within two years after the date the loss was or should have been discovered. . . ."); Wiggins v. Edwards , 314 S.C. 126, 128 , 442 S.E.2d 169, 170 (1994) (requiring an injured party to "act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist"). 2. 2010Code Ann. §15-78-110 (2005) ("[A]ny action brought pursuant to [the Tort Claims Act] is forever barred unless an action is commenced within two years after the date the loss was or should have been discovered. . . ."); Wiggins v. Edwards , 314 S.C. 126, 128 , 442 S.E.2d 169, 170 (1994) (requiring an injured party to "act with some promptness where the facts and circumstances of an injury would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist"). 2. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bynesgreen2 sentences2010As to the Town's issue of good time credits and early release: State v. Bynes , 304 S.C. 62, 65 , 403 S.E.2d 126, 127 (Ct. App. 1991) (requiring a contemporaneous objection to preserve sentencing issue for appellate review). 2010As to the Town's issue of good time credits and early release: State v. Bynes , 304 S.C. 62, 65 , 403 S.E.2d 126, 127 (Ct. App. 1991) (requiring a contemporaneous objection to preserve sentencing issue for appellate review). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Town of Hilton Head Island v. Godwin
green
2 sentences2009On appeal, this court vacated the circuit court’s grant of a new trial, finding “the municipal court correctly held Godwin’s challenge to his conviction was untimely, and the circuit court erred in failing to grant the Town’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.” Id. at 225 , 634 S.E.2d at 61 . 2009On appeal, this court vacated the circuit court’s grant of a new trial, finding “the municipal court correctly held Godwin’s challenge to his conviction was untimely, and the circuit court erred in failing to grant the Town’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.” Id. at 225 , 634 S.E.2d at 61 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1997DISMISSAL OF CHARGE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS The Town also asserts the circuit court erred in dismissing the DUI charge as a sanction for the Town’s violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Rule 5, SCRCrimP. 1997DISMISSAL OF CHARGE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS The Town also asserts the circuit court erred in dismissing the DUI charge as a sanction for the Town’s violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and Rule 5, SCRCrimP. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Floyd v. Parker Water & Sewer Sub-District
green
2 sentences1952In Floyd v. Parker Water and Sewer Sub-district, supra, 203 S. C. 276, 17 S. E. (2d) 223 , we upheld an act enlarging the powers of a district established to furnish water and *449 sewerage by adding the functions of providing fire protection and garbage disposal, which are services generally furnished by towns and cities, but the area of the district did not include any incorporated towns. 1952In Floyd v. Parker Water and Sewer Sub-district, supra, 203 S. C. 276, 17 S. E. (2d) 223 , we upheld an act enlarging the powers of a district established to furnish water and *449 sewerage by adding the functions of providing fire protection and garbage disposal, which are services generally furnished by towns and cities, but the area of the district did not include any incorporated towns. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.