wholesome principle (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

wholesome principle in South Carolina

7 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.green
sc · 1911 · cited in 2 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1982–2014
2 sentences

2014Id. at 408 , 71 S.E. at 1012 (emphasis added).

1982It is rested upon the wholesome principle which allows every litigant one opportunity to try his case on the merits, but limits him, in the interest of the public, to one such opportunity.” 89 S. C. at 421, 71 S. E. 1010 .

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
MacKey v. Frazier green
sc · 1959
1 sentence

1982This language has been cited with approval in the case of Mackey v. Frazier, 234 S. C. 81, 106 S. E. (2d) 895 (1959).

11982–1982
Patterson v. British & American Mortgage Co. green
· 1919
1 sentence

1946It is also true that it is the policy of the law to sustain judicial sales fairly made —a wholesome rule which should be firmly adhered to.’ (Emphasis added.) “In the case of Patterson v. B. & A. Mortgage Co., 112 S. C., 205, 99 S. E., 828 , the Court says: “ ‘The Court ordering the sale had jurisdiction of the subject matter, and all proper parties were before the Court when the order was made. “ ‘ “It is undoubtedly the policy of the law to maintain judicial sales, whenever it can be done without violating principles or doing injustice; and in this view it is held that a purchaser at such sa

11946–1946
Wooten v. Seanch green
sc · 1938
1 sentence

1946It is also true that it is the policy of the law to sustain judicial sales fairly made —a wholesome rule which should be firmly adhered to.’ (Emphasis added.) “In the case of Patterson v. B. & A. Mortgage Co., 112 S. C., 205, 99 S. E., 828 , the Court says: “ ‘The Court ordering the sale had jurisdiction of the subject matter, and all proper parties were before the Court when the order was made. “ ‘ “It is undoubtedly the policy of the law to maintain judicial sales, whenever it can be done without violating principles or doing injustice; and in this view it is held that a purchaser at such sa

11946–1946
Owens v. . Owens green
nc · 1888
2 sentences

1930Such an instance has occurred in our own Court, in the case of Owens v. Owens, 100 N. C., 240 , 6 S. E., 794 , where a widow, convicted as accessory before the fact to her husband’s murder, was awarded dower under the statute, a decision which caused an immediate amendment of the statute (Pub.

1930Such an instance has occurred in our own Court, in the case of Owens v. Owens, 100 N. C., 240 , 6 S. E., 794 , where a widow, convicted as accessory before the fact to her husband’s murder, was awarded dower under the statute, a decision which caused an immediate amendment of the statute (Pub.

11930–1930
Farrow v. Farrow green
· 1911
1 sentence

1915The views of the writer of this opinion upon this subject were more fully set forth in Farrow v. Farrow, 88 S. C. 342, 70 S. E. 459 , and need not be repeated here.

11915–1915
Edgefield Mfg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. green
sc · 1907
1 sentence

1912Co. v. Casualty Co., 78 S. C. 81, 58 S. E. 969 , the following wholesome principle, in the disposition of appeals, was announced by this Court: “We do not say there was not a scintilla of evidence supporting the defense; and if the verdict had been for the defendant, the scintilla would have prevented this Court from ordering a new trial for lack of facts to sustain the defense.

11912–1912
Rookard v. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. green
sc · 1909
1 sentence

1911In Logan’s case, and also in Rookard’s case, 84 S. C. 190, 65 S. E. 1047 , it is stated' that a judgment on the merits in favor of a lessee railroad company would bar an action against the lessor for the same cause, because the liability of the lessor is predicated upon that of the lessee.

11911–1911

Where else courts name it

NC 17 (1885–1985) IA 16 (1900–1980) NY 15 (1882–1956) TX 15 (1905–1963) MO 10 (1893–1963) PA 10 (1831–1987) KS 9 (1897–1964) CA 8 (1895–2021) WA 7 (1912–1973) ND 7 (1897–1981) OK 7 (1913–1955) SC 7 (1911–2014) AR 7 (1921–1985) NE 6 (1893–1939) UT 6 (1908–2020) NJ 6 (1869–1958) KY 5 (1909–2006) MN 5 (1897–1925) AL 4 (1877–1923) OH 4 (1906–2001) MS 4 (1882–1954) SD 4 (1892–1969) OR 3 (1889–1973) NM 3 (1915–1962) CO 3 (1909–1952) WV 3 (1903–1961) IN 2 (1884–1901) IL 2 (1895–1936) DC 2 (1998–1998) MA 2 (1931–1968) MI 2 (1899–1913)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check