Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1939–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McLean v. Merrimangreen2 sentences1999Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’ ” Id. (quoting *398 McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). 1999Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’ ” Id. (quoting *398 McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). | 6 | 6 |
Uken v. Sloatgreen2 sentences1999Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’ ” Id. (quoting *398 McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). 1999Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’ ” Id. (quoting *398 McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. City of Mitchell
green
2 sentences1999Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’ ” Id. (quoting *398 McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). 1997Peterson, 499 N.W.2d at 915 -16 (citing Uken v. Sloat, 296 N.W.2d 540, 542-43 (S.D.1980)). “ ‘An infallible test in determining whether a communication ... is or is not privileged is to ask whether, if true, it is a matter of proper public interest in relation to that with which it is sought to associate it.’” Id. (quoting McLean v. Merriman, 42 S.D. 394, 399 , 175 N.W. 878, 880 (1920)). | 5 | 1996–1999 |
Kieser v. Southeast Properties
green
2 sentences1999Kieser v. Southeast Properties, 1997 SD 87, 14 , 566 N.W.2d 833, 837 . 1999Kieser v. Southeast Properties, 1997 SD 87, 14 , 566 N.W.2d 833, 837 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Kiefer v. Dickson
neutral
2 sentences1939As said in the case of Kiefer v. Dickson, 41 Ind. App. 543 , 84 N. E. 523 , 525: “While the presence or absence of windows is not an infallible test of a party wall, their presence is a good indication that it is not a party wall. 1939As said in the case of Kiefer v. Dickson, 41 Ind. App. 543 , 84 N. E. 523 , 525: “While the presence or absence of windows is not an infallible test of a party wall, their presence is a good indication that it is not a party wall. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.