Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1899–1960 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. State
green
2 sentences1960Willoughby.” Respecting this question, Judge Lump-kin, who delivered the opinion for this court in Chapman v. State, 18 Ga. 736 , said: “Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test. 1942And it is stated in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error “that our sole and only exception in this case is that the difference between the allegations and proof is fatal.” In Chapman v. State, 18 Ga. 736, 738 , the following ruling is found: “Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test. | 4 | 1899–1960 |
Biggers v. State
green
1 sentence1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Graham v. State
green
1 sentence1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Lovett v. State
green
2 sentences1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). 1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Patterson v. State
green
1 sentence1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Chapman v. State
neutral
1 sentence1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Wilson v. State
green
2 sentences1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). 1960Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis is and should always have been the true and only issue.” And the rule, as there stated, has been reannounced and followed in Biggers v. State, 109 Ga. 105 ( 34 S. E. 210 ); Lovett v. State, 9 Ga. App. 232 ( 70 S. E. 989 ); Chapman v. State, 33 Ga. App. 570 ( 126 S. E. 895 ); and Wilson v. State, 67 Ga. App. 404 ( 20 S. E. 2d 433 ). | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Woody v. State
neutral
1 sentence1930Identitate personae and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” See Fielding v. State, 30 Ga. App. 664 ( 118 S. E. 601 ); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 928 (1) ( 39 S. E. 297 ); Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 S. E. 630 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Webb v. State
green
2 sentences1930Identitate personae and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” See Fielding v. State, 30 Ga. App. 664 ( 118 S. E. 601 ); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 928 (1) ( 39 S. E. 297 ); Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 S. E. 630 ). 1930Identitate personae and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” See Fielding v. State, 30 Ga. App. 664 ( 118 S. E. 601 ); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 928 (1) ( 39 S. E. 297 ); Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 S. E. 630 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Watkins v. State
neutral
2 sentences1930In Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), this court said: “Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test in settling the question of variance between allegata and probata. 1930In Watkins v. State, 18 Ga. App. 500 ( 89 S. E. 624 ), this court said: “Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test in settling the question of variance between allegata and probata. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Broadway Apartment Co. v. Barnett
neutral
1 sentence1930Identitate personae and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” See Fielding v. State, 30 Ga. App. 664 ( 118 S. E. 601 ); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 928 (1) ( 39 S. E. 297 ); Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 S. E. 630 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Fielding v. State
neutral
1 sentence1930Identitate personae and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” See Fielding v. State, 30 Ga. App. 664 ( 118 S. E. 601 ); Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 928 (1) ( 39 S. E. 297 ); Webb v. State, 149 Ga. 211 (1) ( 99 S. E. 630 ). | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Ratteree v. State
neutral
1 sentence1907Identitate personae, and not identitate nominis, is and should always have been the true and only issue.” So is the ruling made in Ratteree v. State, 53 Ga. 570 , where it was held: “When a juror’s name was A. J. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
State v. Blankenship
neutral
1 sentence1899In the 21 Mo. 504 , “Blackenship” was held to be idem sonans with “Blankenship.” In 18 Ill. 52 , “McInnis” was held to be idem sonans with “McGinnis.” In 2 Greene (Iowa), 88, “ Conly ” was held idem sonans with “ Conolly.” In the 18 Ga. 736 (Chapman v. State), it was held that “Hudson” was idem sonans with “Hutson.” In delivering the opinion in that case, Lumpkin, J., said : “ Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Barnes v. People
neutral
1 sentence1899In the 21 Mo. 504 , “Blackenship” was held to be idem sonans with “Blankenship.” In 18 Ill. 52 , “McInnis” was held to be idem sonans with “McGinnis.” In 2 Greene (Iowa), 88, “ Conly ” was held idem sonans with “ Conolly.” In the 18 Ga. 736 (Chapman v. State), it was held that “Hudson” was idem sonans with “Hutson.” In delivering the opinion in that case, Lumpkin, J., said : “ Idem sonans is no longer an infallible test. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.