Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1924–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spicer v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Id. at 445-47 . 2002In Spicer, the court stated that “[t]his perceived propensity combined with less than abundant evidence of rape leads us to conclude that the consolidation error affirmatively affected the outcome of the trial.” Id. | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hoyt
red
1 sentence2000A majority of the court, however, found that the consolidation error was harmless and affirmed the child rape conviction. 4 In dissent, Judge David Hayes relied on State v. Hoyt, 928 S.W.2d 935 (Tenn.Crim.App.1995), and stated that because the offenses were alleged in open-dated indictments, the consolidation error was of “such prejudicial dimensions as to require reversal” of the conviction. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Schwartz v. Swan
neutral
2 sentences1983Finally, in Schwartz v. Swan, 63 Ill.App.2d 148 , 211 N.E.2d 122 (1965), the Court discussed many decisions involving multiple accidents and held that joinder was proper unless it could be determined with reasonable certainty to which occurrence the plaintiff’s injuries were attributable. 1983Finally, in Schwartz v. Swan, 63 Ill.App.2d 148 , 211 N.E.2d 122 (1965), the Court discussed many decisions involving multiple accidents and held that joinder was proper unless it could be determined with reasonable certainty to which occurrence the plaintiff’s injuries were attributable. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Beach v. Woodyard
green
1 sentence1924The court apparently overrules, or at least makes no attempt to distinguish its own previous decision n Claiborne v. Gross (1836), 7 Leigh (Va.), 331 , in which Cabe, J., delivered a learned opinion, holding such a consolidation unauthorized — an opinion which is extensively quoted in 4 Encyclopedia Pleading & Practice, 689, note, without mentioning Patterson v. Eakin, supra. The Virginia court, in Patterson v. Eakin, also relies (page 55 [ 12 S. E., 144 ]), on the dicta in Beach v. Woodyard, 5 W. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Patterson v. Eakin
green
2 sentences1924It was said, arguendo, by Mookb, J., at page 232: “I am of opinion that where the parties are the same, and separate suits have been brought in equity upon matters which should have been united in one suit, and the defense is the same in all, a consolidation rule o'ught to be granted; for, otherwise, the defendant would be oppressed, if not ruined, by an unnecessary accumulation of costs.” ”' In Patterson v. Eahin et al. (1890), 87 Va., 49 , 12 S. E., 144 , it was held that the trial court properly consolidated two suits in equity, brought by different plaintiffs, “súb- *112 stantially against 1924It was said, arguendo, by Mookb, J., at page 232: “I am of opinion that where the parties are the same, and separate suits have been brought in equity upon matters which should have been united in one suit, and the defense is the same in all, a consolidation rule o'ught to be granted; for, otherwise, the defendant would be oppressed, if not ruined, by an unnecessary accumulation of costs.” ”' In Patterson v. Eahin et al. (1890), 87 Va., 49 , 12 S. E., 144 , it was held that the trial court properly consolidated two suits in equity, brought by different plaintiffs, “súb- *112 stantially against | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.