Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reidgreen2 sentences2006See State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d at 282-83 , holding that any contradiction between the statute and the Nesbit instruction inures to the benefit of Defendant; therefore, this argument does not entitle Defendant to relief. *849 47. [Deleted: Sufficiency of evidence to support jury's finding that aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt] 48. [Deleted: Proportionality Review] [Deleted: CONCLUSION] ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., SP. 2006See State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d at 282-83 , holding that any contradiction between the statute and the Nesbit instruction inures to the benefit of Defendant; therefore, this argument does not entitle Defendant to relief. 47. [Deleted: Sufficiency of evidence to support jury’s finding that aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt] 48. [Deleted: Proportionality Review] [Deleted: CONCLUSION] | 5 | 5 |
State v. Nesbitgreen2 sentences2002Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 (“[W]e hereby suggest the following instruction.... ”). 2002Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 892 (“[W]e hereby suggest the following instruction.... ”). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.