Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Abbott v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Abbott v. State, 245 S.W.3d 19, 23 (Tex.App. — Waco, 2007, pet. filed). 2008Abbott v. State, 245 S.W.3d 19, 23 (Tex.App. — Waco, 2007, pet. filed). | 2 | 2 |
Abbott v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See id. ; State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Gore v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Cfi Gore v. State, 719 So.2d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 1998) (holding that the following prosecutor’s argument misstated the burden of proof and was error: “It’s simple and it comes down to this in simplicity: If you believe his story, he’s not guilty. 2006Cf. Gore v. State, 719 So.2d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 1998) (holding that the following prosecutor's argument misstated the burden of proof and was error: "It's simple and it comes down to this in simplicity: If you believe his story, he's not guilty. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Abbott v. G.G.E
green
2 sentences2015F. Conclusion on Standing Plaintiffs Bray and Littlefield have standing as individual plaintiffs under the Abbott rule. 463 S.W.3d at 633 . 2015F. Conclusion on Standing Plaintiffs Bray and Littlefield have standing as individual plaintiffs under the Abbott rule. 463 S.W.3d at 633 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Texans Uniting for Reform & Freedom v. Saenz
green
2 sentences2015Plaintiffs Bray and Littlefield have taxpayer standing as provided for under the TURF exception. 319 S.W.3d at 919 . 2015Plaintiffs Bray and Littlefield have taxpayer standing as provided for under the TURF exception. 319 S.W.3d at 919 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Federal Sign v. Texas Southern University
red
2 sentences2011Abbott’s pleadings contained statements that the City waived immunity through its conduct. 10 A 1997 Texas Supreme Court opinion entitled Federal Sign v. Texas Southern University (cited in Abbott’s brief), contains a footnote which seemingly encourages the possibility of waiver of immunity by conduct. 951 S.W.2d 401 , 408 n. 1 (Tex.1997). 2011There, the court wrote that there could be “circumstances where the State may waive its immunity by conduct other than simply executing a contract so that it is not always immune from suit when it contracts.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.