Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2002–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. Partnershipgreen1 sentence2013Partners Ltd., 146 S.W.3d 79, 84 (Tex. 2004) (noting that a statute's silence can be significant and that an analysis begins with presumption that the Legislature knows how to enact what it intends). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.
green
2 sentences2015Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 . 2015Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27 , 101 S.Ct. 2153 . | 6 | 2002–2015 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
1 sentence2015Id. a child's sound development as uncertainty over whether he is to remain in his current "home," under the care of Here, the analysis begins with the presumption that his parents or foster parents, especially when such our rules governing preservation of jury-charge error uncertainty is prolonged. comport with due process. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.