Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.red2 sentences2013Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485 (“We hold that a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA’s administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action for such violation.”); see Alexander, 300 S.W.3d at 70 n. 4 (citing Schroeder). 2009Dist. v. Lowery , 212 S.W.3d 827, 833 (Tex. App.--Austin 2006, pet. denied); Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Lynn , No. 03-04-00635-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14 (Tex. App.--Austin Aug. 19, 2005, pet. denied) (mem. op.); City of Houston v. Fletcher , 63 S.W.3d 920, 922 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); see also Schroeder , 813 S.W.2d at 485-86 (describing TCHRA as "a comprehensive administrative review system" and holding that "a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA's administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action f | 5 | 5 |
Czerwinski v. UNIV. OF TEX. HEALTH, ETC.green2 sentences2012See Czerwinski, 116 S.W.3d at 121 -22 (citing Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485-89 ). 2011See Czerwinski, 116 S.W.3d at 121-22 (citing Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485-89 ). | 2 | 2 |
Thomas v. Longgreen2 sentences2009"Failure to exhaust administrative remedies is truly jurisdictional in nature: it deprives courts of subject-matter jurisdiction over a claim." Lynn , 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14; see Thomas v. Long , 207 S.W.3d 334, 340-42 (Tex. 2006) (holding failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction). 2009“Failure to exhaust administrative remedies is truly jurisdictional in nature: it deprives courts of subject-matter jurisdiction over a claim.” Lynn, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14; see Thomas v. Long, 207 S.W.3d 334, 340-42 (Tex. 2006) (holding failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction). | 2 | 2 |
City of Houston v. Fletchergreen2 sentences2009Dist. v. Lowery , 212 S.W.3d 827, 833 (Tex. App.--Austin 2006, pet. denied); Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Lynn , No. 03-04-00635-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14 (Tex. App.--Austin Aug. 19, 2005, pet. denied) (mem. op.); City of Houston v. Fletcher , 63 S.W.3d 920, 922 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); see also Schroeder , 813 S.W.2d at 485-86 (describing TCHRA as "a comprehensive administrative review system" and holding that "a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA's administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action f 2009Dist. v. Lowery, 212 S.W.3d 827, 833 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, pet. denied); Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Lynn, No. 03-04-00635-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 19, 2005, pet. denied) (mem. op.); City of Houston v. Fletcher, 63 S.W.3d 920, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); see also Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485-86 (describing TCHRA as “a comprehensive administrative review system” and holding that “a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA’s administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action for such | 2 | 2 |
Austin Independent School District v. Lowerygreen2 sentences2009Dist. v. Lowery , 212 S.W.3d 827, 833 (Tex. App.--Austin 2006, pet. denied); Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Lynn , No. 03-04-00635-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14 (Tex. App.--Austin Aug. 19, 2005, pet. denied) (mem. op.); City of Houston v. Fletcher , 63 S.W.3d 920, 922 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); see also Schroeder , 813 S.W.2d at 485-86 (describing TCHRA as "a comprehensive administrative review system" and holding that "a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA's administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action f 2009Dist. v. Lowery, 212 S.W.3d 827, 833 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, pet. denied); Texas Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs. v. Lynn, No. 03-04-00635-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6682 , at *14 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 19, 2005, pet. denied) (mem. op.); City of Houston v. Fletcher, 63 S.W.3d 920, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); see also Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485-86 (describing TCHRA as “a comprehensive administrative review system” and holding that “a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA’s administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action for such | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Alexandergreen1 sentence2013Schroeder, 813 S.W.2d at 485 (“We hold that a person claiming a CHRA violation must first exhaust the CHRA’s administrative remedies prior to bringing a civil action for such violation.”); see Alexander, 300 S.W.3d at 70 n. 4 (citing Schroeder). | 1 | 1 |
University of Texas v. Poindextergreen2 sentences2012See Poindexter, 306 S.W.3d at 808 . 2012See Poindexter, 306 S.W.3d at 808 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Waco v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2011The Lopez court observed that, although the plaintiff never pleaded a CHRA claim, his internal grievance with the City complaining of age and race discrimination and his related retaliation claim “indisputably implicate[d] the CHRA’s anti-retaliation provision.” Id. at 151 . 2011The Lopez court observed that, although the plaintiff never pleaded a CHRA claim, his internal grievance with the City complaining of age and race discrimination and his related retaliation claim “indisputably implicate[d] the CHRA’s anti-retaliation provision.” Id. at 151 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.