Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rowntree v. Hunsuckergreen2 sentences2020See Rowntree, 833 S.W.2d at 108 ; see also Winston, 132 S.W.3d at 208 (“[i]n order to use a course-of-treatment analysis in connection with prescription drugs, the alleged drug treatment must be the direct cause of the injury.”). 2004Rowntree, 833 S.W.2d at 107 (finding such a rule "unworkable"). [3] In order to use a course-of-treatment analysis in connection with prescription drugs, the alleged drug treatment must be the direct cause of the injury. | 3 | 4 |
Kimball v. Brothersgreen2 sentences2004Kimball, 741 S.W.2d at 372 . 2004Kimball, 741 S.W.2d at 372 . | 2 | 3 |
Shah v. Mossgreen2 sentences2004Shah, 67 S.W.3d at 843-44 . *209 Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment. 2002The Court concludes that the court of appeals erred in applying a course-of-treatment analysis because "Moss's medical records demonstrate that Moss's last `recheck' visit was on October 23, 1993, and Dr. Shah did not diagnose the second detached retina until Moss visited Dr. Shah more than twelve months later on November 22, 1994." 67 S.W.3d at 845. | 2 | 3 |
Husain v. Khatibgreen2 sentences2002Husain, 964 S.W.2d at 919-20 ; Chambers, 883 S.W.2d at 159 . 2002See Husain v. Khatib, 964 S.W.2d 918, 919 (Tex. 1998). | 2 | 2 |
Chambers v. Conawaygreen2 sentences2002See 883 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.1993). 1995Even though the supreme court rejected the course of treatment analysis in Chambers v. Conaway, cited by both parties, it gave support to the view that limitations accrues from the date of last treatment under facts similar to these. 883 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.1993). | 1 | 2 |
Winston v. Peterekgreen1 sentence2020See Rowntree, 833 S.W.2d at 108 ; see also Winston, 132 S.W.3d at 208 (“[i]n order to use a course-of-treatment analysis in connection with prescription drugs, the alleged drug treatment must be the direct cause of the injury.”). | 1 | 1 |
Moss v. Shahgreen2 sentences2002See 7 S.W.3d at 692 . 2002See 7 S.W.3d at 692 . | 1 | 1 |
Bala v. Maxwellgreen2 sentences2002Chambers, 883 S.W.2d at 159 ; see also Bala, 909 S.W.2d at 892 (holding that doctor could have breached duty to conduct follow-up medical tests only when he examined the plaintiff on specific dates and thus limitations ran from the plaintiffs last office visit). 2002Chambers, 883 S.W.2d at 159 ; see also Bala, 909 S.W.2d at 892 (holding that doctor could have breached duty to conduct follow-up medical tests only when he examined the plaintiff on specific dates and thus limitations ran from the plaintiff's last office visit). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Conaway v. Chambers
green
1 sentence1995In Chambers, the supreme court affirmed the court of appeals’ judgment, agreeing with its disposition of the ease but not its reasoning. 823 S.W.2d 331 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1991), aff'd, 883 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.