Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1917–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lane v. Stategreen1 sentence2010We have found that the general application of this rule has not proven to be burdensome for defense counsel in many cases. 8 Id. at 717–18 (emphasis added and footnote omitted); see Lane v. State, 151 S.W.3d 188, 193 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Stategreen1 sentence2010App. 2004) (relying on Leday to overrule an evidentiary issue); see also Long v. State, 10 S.W.3d 389, 399 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 2000, pet. ref‘d) (explaining that the requirement of objecting each time inadmissible evidence is offered ―remains true with regard to testimony regarding polygraph examination results‖). | 1 | 1 |
Ethington v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Ethington v. State, 819 S.W.2d 854, 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). 1998Ethington v. State, 819 S.W.2d 854, 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Supreme Court Commissioners
neutral
2 sentences1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Texas, 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Texas, 330 , upholding the validity of our former Commission of Appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other States: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb., 655 , 56 N. W., 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind., 350 , supra; People ex rel. 1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Texas, 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Texas, 330 , upholding the validity of our former Commission of Appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other States: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb., 655 , 56 N. W., 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind., 350 , supra; People ex rel. | 2 | 1917–1917 |
Henderson v. Beaton
green
2 sentences1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above-mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Tex. 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex. 830 . upholding the validity of our former Commission of appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other states: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb. 655 , 56 N. W. 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind. 350 , 21 N. E. 244 , 4 L. 1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Texas, 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Texas, 330 , upholding the validity of our former Commission of Appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other States: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb., 655 , 56 N. W., 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind., 350 , supra; People ex rel. | 2 | 1917–1917 |
State ex rel. Hovey v. Noble
green
2 sentences1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above-mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Tex. 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex. 830 . upholding the validity of our former Commission of appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other states: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb. 655 , 56 N. W. 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind. 350 , 21 N. E. 244 , 4 L. 1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Texas, 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Texas, 330 , upholding the validity of our former Commission of Appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other States: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb., 655 , 56 N. W., 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind., 350 , supra; People ex rel. | 2 | 1917–1917 |
Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen
red
2 sentences1994Id. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 987 . 7 Consequently, the Court held that “Louisiana’s refusal to apply forum non conveniens does not, therefore, work ‘material prejudice to [a] characteristic featur[e] of the general maritime law.’ ” Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 983 (quoting Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. at 216 , 37 S.Ct. at 529 ). 1994Id. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 987 . 7 Consequently, the Court held that “Louisiana’s refusal to apply forum non conveniens does not, therefore, work ‘material prejudice to [a] characteristic featur[e] of the general maritime law.’ ” Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 983 (quoting Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. at 216 , 37 S.Ct. at 529 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.
green
1 sentence1994Id. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 987 . 7 Consequently, the Court held that “Louisiana’s refusal to apply forum non conveniens does not, therefore, work ‘material prejudice to [a] characteristic featur[e] of the general maritime law.’ ” Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 983 (quoting Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. at 216 , 37 S.Ct. at 529 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
American Dredging Co. v. Miller
green
2 sentences1994Id. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 987 . 7 Consequently, the Court held that “Louisiana’s refusal to apply forum non conveniens does not, therefore, work ‘material prejudice to [a] characteristic featur[e] of the general maritime law.’ ” Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 983 (quoting Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. at 216 , 37 S.Ct. at 529 ). 1994Id. at-, 114 S.Ct. at 987 . 7 Consequently, the Court held that “Louisiana’s refusal to apply forum non conveniens does not, therefore, work ‘material prejudice to [a] characteristic featur[e] of the general maritime law.’ ” Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 983 (quoting Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. at 216 , 37 S.Ct. at 529 ). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Moore v. Moore
neutral
1 sentence1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Simon v. State
neutral
2 sentences1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Lambert v. State
neutral
2 sentences1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Foote v. State
neutral
2 sentences1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson
green
1 sentence1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Hicks v. State
green
2 sentences1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Pinkard v. Pinkard
green
1 sentence1943It has been approved and applied in Texas in suits involving heir-ship (Pinkard v. Pinkard, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 265—dicta, Moore v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 299 S.W. 653 and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W.2d 811 , involving workman’s compensation), incest prosecutions (Simon v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 186 , 20 S.W. 399 , 37 Am.St.Rep. 802 , and Foot v. State, 65 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 144 S.W. 275 , Ann.Cas.1916A, 1184), and prosecutions for child abandonment (Hicks v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 629 , 263 S.W. 291 , and Lambert v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 60 S.W.2d 460 | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Johns v. Montgomery
green
1 sentence1936The principle of the rule is well stated in ’ Restatement .of the Law of Trusts, § 167, p.. 415, as follows: “The court'will direct or permit the trustee1 to deviate from a term of the trust if owing to circumstances not known to the settlor and not anticipated by him compliance would defeat or substantially impair the accomplishmérit of the purposes of the trust; and in such case, if necessary to carry out the purposes of the trust, the court may direct or permit the trustee to do. acts which, are not authorized or are forbidden by the' terms of the trust.” This rule was recognized in Texas i | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Lueft v. Lueft
neutral
2 sentences1936The principle of the rule is well stated in ’ Restatement .of the Law of Trusts, § 167, p.. 415, as follows: “The court'will direct or permit the trustee1 to deviate from a term of the trust if owing to circumstances not known to the settlor and not anticipated by him compliance would defeat or substantially impair the accomplishmérit of the purposes of the trust; and in such case, if necessary to carry out the purposes of the trust, the court may direct or permit the trustee to do. acts which, are not authorized or are forbidden by the' terms of the trust.” This rule was recognized in Texas i 1936The principle of the rule is well stated in ’ Restatement .of the Law of Trusts, § 167, p.. 415, as follows: “The court'will direct or permit the trustee1 to deviate from a term of the trust if owing to circumstances not known to the settlor and not anticipated by him compliance would defeat or substantially impair the accomplishmérit of the purposes of the trust; and in such case, if necessary to carry out the purposes of the trust, the court may direct or permit the trustee to do. acts which, are not authorized or are forbidden by the' terms of the trust.” This rule was recognized in Texas i | 1 | 1936–1936 |
González v. Rosado
green
1 sentence1917Morgan v. Hayne, 83 Cal., 111 , 23 Pac., 1 , 17 Am. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
People ex rel. Morgan v. Hayne
green
1 sentence1917Morgan v. Hayne, 83 Cal., 111 , 23 Pac., 1 , 17 Am. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Stone v. Brown
green
1 sentence1917Illustrating the general application of the principle just stated, which is in line with the above mentioned decisions of the Supreme Court of Texas in Henderson v. Beaton, 52 Texas, 29 , and Stone v. Brown, 54 Texas, 330 , upholding the validity of our former Commission of Appeals statutes, are the following decisions of other States: In re Supreme Court Commissioners, 37 Neb., 655 , 56 N. W., 298 ; State v. Noble, 118 Ind., 350 , supra; People ex rel. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.