growing rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

growing rule in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1911–1976 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Gentry v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1911 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
2 sentences

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Jones v. State green
texcrimapp · 1930
2 sentences

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

1932In Corpus Juris, vol. 45, sec. 19, on page 389, it is said: “* * * the doctrine of idem sonans has been much enlarged by modern de *284 cisions to conform to the growing rule that a variance in name, to be material, must be such a one as has misled a party to his prejudice.” See Jones v. State, 115 Texas Crim.

31932–1976
State v. White neutral
sc · 1891
2 sentences

1930And if the words can be sounded alike, without disturbing the power of the letters that is found in the variant orthography, the variance will be immaterial. * * * Identity of sound may be regarded as a surer method of designating the names of persons *423 than that of depending upon mere identity in the orthography.’ * * * ‘The doctrine of idem sonans has been much enlarged by modern decisions to conform to the growing rule that a variance, to be material, must be such as would mislead a party to his prejudice.’ State v. White, 34 S. C. 59, 12 S. E.

1917State v. White, 34 S. C., 59, 12 S. E.

31911–1930
Ciulla v. State green
texcrimapp · 1930
2 sentences

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

21932–1976
Brady v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1932
2 sentences

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

1976See Gentry v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 497 , 137 S.W. 696 (1911); Ciulla v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 193 , 28 S.W.2d 541 (1930); Brady v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 279 , 55 S.W.2d 104 (1932); Jones v. State, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 418 , 27 S.W.2d 653 (1930); 40 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 21, p. 395. 2 .

11976–1976
Lyne v. Sanford green
· 1891
1 sentence

1912Lyne v. Sanford, 82 Tex. 63 , 19 S. W. 847 , 27 Am.

11912–1912

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1911–1976) PA 2 (1958–1981) MO 2 (1883–1912)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check