Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arteaga v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Arteaga v. State, 521 S.W.3d 329, 333 (Tex. Crim. 2018As noted above, we review claims of jury charge error under the test set forth in Almanza, determining first whether error exists, then evaluating the harm caused by any error. 23 686 S.W.2d at 171 ; Arteaga, 521 S.W.3d at 333 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 . | 4 | 5 |
Ngo v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Arteaga, 521 S.W.3d at 333 ; Ngo v. State, 175 S.W.3d 738, 743 (Tex. Crim. 2018As noted above, we review claims of jury charge error under the test set forth in Almanza, determining first whether error exists, then evaluating the harm caused by any error. 23 686 S.W.2d at 171 ; Arteaga, 521 S.W.3d at 333 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 . | 2 | 2 |
Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.green1 sentence2014See Cortez v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc., 131 S.W.3d 113, 119 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2004), aff'd, 159 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio Inc.green1 sentence2014See Cortez v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc., 131 S.W.3d 113, 119 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2004), aff'd, 159 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Almanza v. State
green
1 sentence2018As noted above, we review claims of jury charge error under the test set forth in Almanza, determining first whether error exists, then evaluating the harm caused by any error. 23 686 S.W.2d at 171 ; Arteaga, 521 S.W.3d at 333 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Mendez v. State
green
1 sentence2018When, as here, the defendant fails to preserve error by timely objection at trial, reversal is warranted only upon a showing of “egregious harm” such that the defendant was deprived of “a fair and impartial trial.” Mendez, 545 S.W.3d at 552 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |