Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ogletree v. Matthewsgreen2 sentences2011See Ogletree, 262 S.W.3d at 322 (finding that hospital’s failure to object within twenty-one day statutory period to expert report on sufficiency grounds, including that nurses were not qualified to render opinion as to causation, waived objections). 2. 2011See Ogletree , 262 S.W.3d at 322 (finding that hospital’s failure to object within twenty-one day statutory period to expert report on sufficiency grounds, including that nurses were not qualified to render opinion as to causation, waived objections). 2. | 2 | 2 |
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Councilgreen2 sentences2012Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1029 , 112 S.Ct. 2886 , 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992) (noting that a claimant cannot recover under a regulatory takings theory if state law would have deemed the claimant's activities a public nuisance); Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana, 369 F.3d 882, 893-94 (5th Cir.2004) (finding that the Lucas rule applies under Texas law); RBIII, L.P. v. City of San Antonio, No. SA-09-CV-119-XR, 2010 WL 3516180 , at *12-13, 2010 U.S. Dist. 2012Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1029 , 112 S.Ct. 2886 , 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992) (noting that a claimant cannot recover under a regulatory takings theory if state law would have deemed the claimant's activities a public nuisance); Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana, 369 F.3d 882, 893-94 (5th Cir.2004) (finding that the Lucas rule applies under Texas law); RBIII, L.P. v. City of San Antonio, No. SA-09-CV-119-XR, 2010 WL 3516180 , at *12-13, 2010 U.S. Dist. | 1 | 4 |
Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abelgreen1 sentence2015See Surgitek, Bristol–Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (courts look to substance of pleading rather than its caption or form to determine its nature). | 1 | 1 |
Vulcan Materials Company v. The City of Tehuacanagreen2 sentences2012Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1029 , 112 S.Ct. 2886 , 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992) (noting that a claimant cannot recover under a regulatory takings theory if state law would have deemed the claimant's activities a public nuisance); Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana, 369 F.3d 882, 893-94 (5th Cir.2004) (finding that the Lucas rule applies under Texas law); RBIII, L.P. v. City of San Antonio, No. SA-09-CV-119-XR, 2010 WL 3516180 , at *12-13, 2010 U.S. Dist. 2012Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1029 , 112 S.Ct. 2886 , 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992) (noting that a claimant cannot recover under a regulatory takings theory if state law would have deemed the claimant's activities a public nuisance); Vulcan Materials Co. v. City of Tehuacana, 369 F.3d 882, 893-94 (5th Cir.2004) (finding that the Lucas rule applies under Texas law); RBIII, L.P. v. City of San Antonio, No. SA-09-CV-119-XR, 2010 WL 3516180 , at *12-13, 2010 U.S. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
City of East Dallas v. Barksdalegreen2 sentences2008See City of East Dallas v. Barksdale, 83 Tex. 117, 122 , 18 S.W. 329, 331 (1892); Tarrant County Water Control & Improv. 2008See City of East Dallas v. Barksdale, 83 Tex. 117, 122 , 18 S.W. 329, 331 (1892); Tarrant County Water Control & Improv. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.
green
2 sentences2007Lingle, 544 U.S. at 540 , 125 S.Ct. 2074 . 2007Lingle, 544 U.S. at 540 , 125 S.Ct. 2074 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Hallco Texas, Inc. v. McMullen County
green
2 sentences2007See Mayhew at 937 ; Hallco Texas, Inc. v. McMullen County, 221 S.W.3d 50 (Tex.2006). 2007See Mayhew at 937 ; Hallco Texas, Inc. v. McMullen County, 221 S.W.3d 50 (Tex.2006). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.