Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nenno v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Nenno v. State , 970 S.W.2d 549, 559 (Tex. Crim. 2003See Nenno v. State , 970 S.W.2d 549, 559 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Schulmangreen1 sentence2023P. 48.4; see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 2 We note that challenges requiring development of a record to substantiate a claim, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, may be raised in an application for writ of habeas corpus. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stafford v. State
green
1 sentence2021App. 2005) (“Due to the nature of Anders briefs, by indicating in the opinion it considered the issues raised in the brief and reviewed the record for reversible error but found none, the court of appeals met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 47.1.”); Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 509 . 2 2 We note that challenges requiring development of a record to substantiate a claim, such as ineffective assistance of counsel, may be raised in an application for writ of habeas corpus. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Herndon
green
1 sentence2008While refusing to set out bright-line rules for appellate review of a trial court's discretion in granting a new trial, the Herndon court opines that a trial court would not generally abuse its discretion in granting a new trial if the defendant: (1) articulates a valid legal claim; (2) produces evidence or points to evidence in the record to substantiate that claim; and (3) shows prejudice to his substantial rights under the standards of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2. (5) Herndon , 215 S.W.3d at 909 ; see Tex. R. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Briggs v. State
green
1 sentence1999There is simply no citation by appellant to any portion of the record to substantiate this claim, and the burden is on him to show that the unconstitutional operation of the statute affected him in particular, See Briggs, 740 S.W.2d at 806 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Powers v. State
green
2 sentences1996Powers, 727 S.W.2d at 316 . 1996Powers, 727 S.W.2d at 316 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.