Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See Williams v. State , 958 S.W.2d 186, 194 (Tex. Crim. 2009See Williams , 958 S.W.2d at 195 . | 4 | 4 |
LMW v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Carmouche, 10 S.W.3d at 331–32 (deferring to videotape of search rather than officer testimony when videotape belied testimony); L.M.W. v. State, 891 S.W.2d 754, 759 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, pet. ref’d). 10 search of his entire vehicle, including the interior of the glove box, we hold that the trial court erred by denying Shelton’s motion to suppress. | 1 | 1 |
Carmouche v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Carmouche, 10 S.W.3d at 331–32 (deferring to videotape of search rather than officer testimony when videotape belied testimony); L.M.W. v. State, 891 S.W.2d 754, 759 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, pet. ref’d). 10 search of his entire vehicle, including the interior of the glove box, we hold that the trial court erred by denying Shelton’s motion to suppress. | 1 | 1 |
National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Dominguezgreen2 sentences1994Co. v. Dominguez, 873 S.W.2d 373, 376-77 (Tex.1994). [2] No evidence appears in the record that Union Bankers would have discovered, upon talking to Shelton, that it lacked a reasonable basis for cancelling coverage. 1994Co. v. Dominguez, 873 S.W.2d 373, 376-77 (Tex.1994). . | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1992See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 (1984); Butler v. State, 716 S.W.2d 48, 53-54 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). 1992See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 (1984); Butler v. State, 716 S.W.2d 48, 53-54 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
Butler v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 (1984); Butler v. State, 716 S.W.2d 48, 53-54 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gonzalez
green
1 sentence1993State v. Gonzalez, 855 S.W.2d at 694-95 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.