Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estrada v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Estrada v. State, 313 S.W.3d 274, 286 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nguyen v. State
green
2 sentences2002The State has confessed error and acknowledges that the conviction cannot stand because of the interpretation given to section 71.02(a)(1) of the Penal Code in Nguyen, 1 S.W.3d at 694 . 2002The State has confessed error and acknowledges that the conviction cannot stand because of the interpretation given to section 71.02(a)(1) of the Penal Code in Nguyen, 1 S.W.3d at 694 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Mata v. State
green
2 sentences2002The State has confessed error, admitting that the facts here are no better than they were in Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902 (Tex.Crim.App.2001), in which the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals concluded the trial court abused its discretion in admitting a retrograde extrapolation by the same witness who testified in this case. 2002The State has confessed error, admitting that the facts here are no better than they were in Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Griffin v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1993Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 18 , 76 S.Ct. 585, 590 , 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898 (1956). 1993Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 18 , 76 S.Ct. 585, 590 , 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898 (1956). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Gill v. State
green
1 sentence1982In Gill v. State, 625 S.W.2d 307 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), the Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed, on the State’s Motion for Rehearing, the concept of “inventory searches.” The Court stated that the concept of a true inventory search is not an exception to the warrant requirement of either the Fourth Amendment or of Art. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Joe's Bonding Company v. State
green
1 sentence1975Since this is fatal to the judgment (Joe’s Bonding Company v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 145 ), there is no need to discuss the matter further. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.