Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2013–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Donaldsongreen2 sentences2026Cf. Donaldson, 557 S.W.3d at 49 (collecting cases). 2021“In a successive prosecution double jeopardy challenge, the defendant has the burden of proving former jeopardy by a preponderance of the evidence, which includes the burden of showing that the offense for which he is threatened with prosecution is the same offense as the one for which he has already been convicted.” State v. Donaldson, 557 S.W.3d 33, 49 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, no pet.) (collecting cases). | 2 | 2 |
Gonzalez v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Gonzalez v. State, 8 S.W.3d 640 , 643 n.9 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Petersongreen1 sentence2017See Ex parte Peterson , 117 S.W.3d 804 , 818 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Hall v. Stategreen1 sentence2016Ex parte Castillo, 469 S.W.3d 165 , 168 n. 6 (Tex.Crim.App. 2015). 3 S.W.3d at 168, citing Hall v. State, 225 S.W.3d 524, 536 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Whitegreen1 sentence2013See Williams v. White, 856 S.W.2d 847, 848 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1993, orig. proceeding) (prohibiting trial pending appeal of non-frivolous claim that jeopardy terminated with mistrial); Trimboli v. MacLean, 735 S.W.2d 953, 954-55 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1987, orig. proceeding) (denying prohibition where mistrial resulted from jury misconduct). | 1 | 1 |
Trimboli v. MacLeangreen1 sentence2013See Williams v. White, 856 S.W.2d 847, 848 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1993, orig. proceeding) (prohibiting trial pending appeal of non-frivolous claim that jeopardy terminated with mistrial); Trimboli v. MacLean, 735 S.W.2d 953, 954-55 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1987, orig. proceeding) (denying prohibition where mistrial resulted from jury misconduct). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Castillo, Ex Parte Thomas Edward
green
1 sentence2016Ex parte Castillo, 469 S.W.3d 165 , 168 n. 6 (Tex.Crim.App. 2015). 3 S.W.3d at 168, citing Hall v. State, 225 S.W.3d 524, 536 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ex Parte Knipp
green
1 sentence2016Ex parte Knipp 236 S.W.3d 214 (Tex.Crim.App.2007), Then, we held that such claims would be cognizable in an original application even when an applicant failed.to.raise the issue at trial. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.