Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bankgreen2 sentences2025See, e.g., Tabe v. Tex. Inpatient Consultants, LLP, No. 01-22-00294-CV, 2023 WL 3063403 , at *5 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 25, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank, 226 S.W.3d 581, 583 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (noting that party is required to request court reporter make record and holding that, because appellant failed to request reporter’s record, court would assume there was sufficient evidence to support trial court’s judgment). 2025See, e.g., Tabe v. Tex. Inpatient Consultants, LLP, No. 01-22-00294-CV, 2023 WL 3063403 , at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 25, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank, 226 S.W.3d 581, 583 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (noting that party is required to request court reporter make record, and holding that because appellant failed to request reporter's record, court would assume there was sufficient evidence to support trial court's judgment). | 2 | 3 |
Henning v. Henninggreen2 sentences2026See Henning v. Henning, 889 S.W.2d 611, 613 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied). 2023See, e.g., Henning v. Henning, 889 S.W.2d 611, 613 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc.green1 sentence2019Tire Co., 190 S.W.3d 796, 803 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, pet. denied) (“[W]hen an appellant fails to bring a reporter’s record, an appellate court must presume the evidence presented was sufficient to support the trial court’s order.”); see also Brazle v. Meadows on the Mews Owners Ass’n, No. 14-10-01016-CV, 2011 WL 6141587 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 8, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Unless an appellant arranges for the filing of a complete reporter’s record (or partial reporter’s record and accompanying statement of 3 issues), we must presume that the proceedings support the trial | 1 | 1 |
Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Services, N.A.green1 sentence2019Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26, 31 (Tex. 1998); Huston v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 434 S.W.3d 630, 637 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (concluding that the appellant had not met her burden of bringing forth a sufficient record demonstrating error by the trial court because she had not presented a record containing the trial court’s ruling); Willms v. Am. | 1 | 1 |
Sharon Huston v. United Parcel Service, Inc.green1 sentence2019Servs., N.A., 972 S.W.2d 26, 31 (Tex. 1998); Huston v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 434 S.W.3d 630, 637 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (concluding that the appellant had not met her burden of bringing forth a sufficient record demonstrating error by the trial court because she had not presented a record containing the trial court’s ruling); Willms v. Am. | 1 | 1 |
Harris County v. Inter Nos, Ltd.green1 sentence2014See Christiansen, 782 S.W.2d at 843 ; Nicholson, 226 S.W.3d at 583 ; see also Brown Mech Servs., 377 S.W.3d at 44 n. 1 (holding that failure to obtain reporter’s record makes it impossible for appellate court to determine whether trial court abused its discretion); Inter Nos Ltd., 199 S.W.3d at 368 (holding that trial court has “broad discretion” in determining extent of cross-examination). | 1 | 1 |
Christiansen v. Prezelskigreen1 sentence2014See Christiansen, 782 S.W.2d at 843 ; Nicholson, 226 S.W.3d at 583 ; see also Brown Mech Servs., 377 S.W.3d at 44 n. 1 (holding that failure to obtain reporter’s record makes it impossible for appellate court to determine whether trial court abused its discretion); Inter Nos Ltd., 199 S.W.3d at 368 (holding that trial court has “broad discretion” in determining extent of cross-examination). | 1 | 1 |
Brown Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.green1 sentence2014See Christiansen, 782 S.W.2d at 843 ; Nicholson, 226 S.W.3d at 583 ; see also Brown Mech Servs., 377 S.W.3d at 44 n. 1 (holding that failure to obtain reporter’s record makes it impossible for appellate court to determine whether trial court abused its discretion); Inter Nos Ltd., 199 S.W.3d at 368 (holding that trial court has “broad discretion” in determining extent of cross-examination). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell
green
1 sentence1992Until the supreme court’s recent opinion in Transamerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991) (orig. proceeding), review of cases involving sanctions simply required application of the “abuse of discretion” standard. | 1 | 1992–1992 |