Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marlow v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See id. at 307–08; Okonkwo, 398 S.W.3d at 697 ; Vasquez, 830 S.W.2d at 950 n.3; see also Marlow v. State, 886 S.W.2d 314, 318 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, pet. ref’d) (“The theories of defense to be included in the jury charge generally fall within counsel’s wide latitude to make strategic and tactical decisions . . . . | 1 | 1 |
Nava, Andres Maldonadogreen1 sentence2026See id. at 307–08; Okonkwo, 398 S.W.3d at 697 ; Vasquez, 830 S.W.2d at 950 n.3; see also Marlow v. State, 886 S.W.2d 314, 318 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, pet. ref’d) (“The theories of defense to be included in the jury charge generally fall within counsel’s wide latitude to make strategic and tactical decisions . . . . | 1 | 1 |
Meyer v. WMCO-GP, LLCgreen1 sentence2017Accordingly, we conclude that the Dargahis did not waive their arguments about agency and equitable estoppel. 9 contains an arbitration provision, but, on the other hand, deny arbitration’s applicability because the defendant is a non-signatory.” Id. at 527 (quoting Meyer v. WMCO-GP, LLC, 211 S.W.3d 302, 305 (Tex. 2006)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vasquez v. State
green
2 sentences2026See id. at 307–08; Okonkwo, 398 S.W.3d at 697 ; Vasquez, 830 S.W.2d at 950 n.3; see also Marlow v. State, 886 S.W.2d 314, 318 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, pet. ref’d) (“The theories of defense to be included in the jury charge generally fall within counsel’s wide latitude to make strategic and tactical decisions . . . . 1994Appellant relies upon Vasquez v. State, 830 S.W.2d 948 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), for the proposition that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to request instructions on alternative defenses that were available. | 2 | 1994–2026 |
Okonkwo, Chidiebele Gabriel
green
1 sentence2026See id. at 307–08; Okonkwo, 398 S.W.3d at 697 ; Vasquez, 830 S.W.2d at 950 n.3; see also Marlow v. State, 886 S.W.2d 314, 318 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, pet. ref’d) (“The theories of defense to be included in the jury charge generally fall within counsel’s wide latitude to make strategic and tactical decisions . . . . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Sylvanus Rene v. State
green
1 sentence2018Rene, 376 S.W.3d at 305-06 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., Lp
green
1 sentence2017Accordingly, we conclude that the Dargahis did not waive their arguments about agency and equitable estoppel. 9 contains an arbitration provision, but, on the other hand, deny arbitration’s applicability because the defendant is a non-signatory.” Id. at 527 (quoting Meyer v. WMCO-GP, LLC, 211 S.W.3d 302, 305 (Tex. 2006)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Solomon v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Ives
green
2 sentences1987Co. v. Ives, 535 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1976, no writ); Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes, 447 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1969, writ ref'd n.r. e.); and Hankamer v. Sumrall, 257 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Civ.App. — Beaumont 1953, writ ref’d n.r.e.). 1987Co. v. Ives, 535 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.Civ.App.Fort Worth 1976, no writ); Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes, 447 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes
green
2 sentences1987Co. v. Ives, 535 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1976, no writ); Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes, 447 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1969, writ ref'd n.r. e.); and Hankamer v. Sumrall, 257 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Civ.App. — Beaumont 1953, writ ref’d n.r.e.). 1987Co. v. Ives, 535 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.Civ.App.Fort Worth 1976, no writ); Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes, 447 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Hankamer v. Sumrall
green
1 sentence1987Co. v. Ives, 535 S.W.2d 400 (Tex.Civ.App. — Fort Worth 1976, no writ); Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Eppes, 447 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1969, writ ref'd n.r. e.); and Hankamer v. Sumrall, 257 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Civ.App. — Beaumont 1953, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr
green
1 sentence1960United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr, Tex.Civ.App., 242 S.W.2d 224 ; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State, 136 Tex. 5 , 145 S.W.2d 569 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State
green
2 sentences1960United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr, Tex.Civ.App., 242 S.W.2d 224 ; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State, 136 Tex. 5 , 145 S.W.2d 569 . 1960United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr, Tex.Civ.App., 242 S.W.2d 224 ; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State, 136 Tex. 5 , 145 S.W.2d 569 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.