Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Human Services v. Hindsgreen2 sentences2014Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, 149 S.W.3d 700, 705 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.); see Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. of Tex. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex. 1995); Romo v. Tex. Dep’t of Transp., 48 S.W.3d 265, 270 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, 2001, no pet.); see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003) (discussing Texas’s adoption of the federal burden-shifting analysis for TCHRA employment-discrimination cases that have not been tried on the merits); M.D. 2004Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex.2003); Texas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex.1995); Romo, 48 S.W.3d at 270 ; Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Bd., 6 S.W.3d 324, 328 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.). | 4 | 4 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cancholagreen2 sentences2014Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, 149 S.W.3d 700, 705 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.); see Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. of Tex. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex. 1995); Romo v. Tex. Dep’t of Transp., 48 S.W.3d 265, 270 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, 2001, no pet.); see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003) (discussing Texas’s adoption of the federal burden-shifting analysis for TCHRA employment-discrimination cases that have not been tried on the merits); M.D. 2004Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex.2003); Texas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex.1995); Romo, 48 S.W.3d at 270 ; Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Bd., 6 S.W.3d 324, 328 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.). | 4 | 4 |
Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Boardgreen2 sentences2004Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex.2003); Texas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex.1995); Romo, 48 S.W.3d at 270 ; Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Bd., 6 S.W.3d 324, 328 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.). 2004Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003); Texas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex. 1995); Romo, 48 S.W.3d at 270 ; Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Bd., 6 S.W.3d 324, 328 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Romo v. Texas Department of Transportationgreen2 sentences2014Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, 149 S.W.3d 700, 705 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004, no pet.); see Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. of Tex. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex. 1995); Romo v. Tex. Dep’t of Transp., 48 S.W.3d 265, 270 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, 2001, no pet.); see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003) (discussing Texas’s adoption of the federal burden-shifting analysis for TCHRA employment-discrimination cases that have not been tried on the merits); M.D. 2004Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex.2003); Texas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hinds, 904 S.W.2d 629, 636 (Tex.1995); Romo, 48 S.W.3d at 270 ; Jaso v. Travis County Juvenile Bd., 6 S.W.3d 324, 328 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.). | 1 | 4 |
Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Cookegreen2 sentences2012Retaliation In its fifth issue, the County argues that the trial court erred in denying its plea to the jurisdiction as to Manion's retaliation claim because Manion failed to state a prima facie case of retaliation, thus depriving the trial court of jurisdiction. (11) "Employment-discrimination cases employ a unique burden-shifting analysis." Cooke , 149 S.W.3d at 705 . 2012Retaliation In its fifth issue, the County argues that the trial court erred in denying its plea to the jurisdiction as to Manion’s retaliation claim because Manion failed to state a prima facie case of 14 retaliation, thus depriving the trial court of jurisdiction.11 “Employment-discrimination cases employ a unique burden-shifting analysis.” Cooke, 149 S.W.3d at 705 . | 1 | 3 |
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Greengreen1 sentence2015McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-05 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.