Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 2011–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perkins v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2024When sitting as finder of fact, the trial court “may accept or reject the testimony” of any witness “in whole or in part.” Perkins v. Commonwealth, 31 Va. App. 326, 331 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Fishergreen1 sentence2011See Fisher, 540 U.S. at 548 (finding no due process violation where substance had tested positive four times for cocaine before it was destroyed). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sanders v. Com.
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2020Because the medical expert had no knowledge that the defendant had chlamydia when she ordered the victim’s lab test, the Court concluded the test was ordered solely for treatment without any reason to believe the results would be used in trial.12 Id. | 3 | 2020–2020 |
Young v. Com.
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Jackson v. Qureshi
green
1 sentence2024“With regard to the ‘knowledge’ requirement, [Clements], as the proponent of the expert witness, had the initial burden to ‘show, among other things, that the “specialty or field of medicine in which [Crawford was] . . . certified” [was] the same as [the nursing staff’s] specialty or a related field of medicine.’” Jackson, 277 Va. at 122 (quoting Lloyd, 275 Va. at 109 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lloyd v. Kime
green
1 sentence2024“With regard to the ‘knowledge’ requirement, [Clements], as the proponent of the expert witness, had the initial burden to ‘show, among other things, that the “specialty or field of medicine in which [Crawford was] . . . certified” [was] the same as [the nursing staff’s] specialty or a related field of medicine.’” Jackson, 277 Va. at 122 (quoting Lloyd, 275 Va. at 109 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Perdieu v. Blackstone Family Practice Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024The testimony in this case is that there was a physician’s order for a lab test and the nursing home didn’t carry it out. - 16 - Crawford knew the standard of care for a nurse regarding each of these situations, (2) whether she knew “what conduct conforms or fails to conform to those standards,” and (3) whether she had an “active clinical practice in either the [nursing staff’s] specialty or a related field of medicine within one year of the date of the alleged act or omission forming the basis of the action.” Perdieu, 264 Va. at 419 . i. Nurse Crawford satisfied the “knowledge” requirement. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.