adequate individualized inquiry (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

adequate individualized inquiry in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Blazinagreen
wash · 2015 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2020
2 sentences

2020The Supreme Court held that the trial court had failed 3 State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827 , 344 P.3d 680 (2015). -7- to make an adequate individualized inquiry into Ramirez’s current and future ability to pay before imposing discretionary legal financial obligations, as required by Blazina.

2020The Supreme Court held that the trial court had failed 3 State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827 , 344 P.3d 680 (2015). -7- to make an adequate individualized inquiry into Ramirez’s current and future ability to pay before imposing discretionary legal financial obligations, as required by Blazina.

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Ramirez green
wash · 2018
2 sentences

2026In Ramirez, the defendant challenged the trial court’s failure to make an adequate individualized inquiry into his ability to pay before imposing discretionary LFOs. 191 Wn.2d at 737 .

2026In Ramirez, the defendant challenged the trial court’s failure to make an adequate individualized inquiry into his ability to pay before imposing discretionary LFOs. 191 Wn.2d at 737 .

32020–2026

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 10.01.160 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 10.101.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check