Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robbins v. Greenegreen1 sentence1989See Robbins, 43 Wn.2d at 323 . | 1 | 1 |
Enslow v. Helmckegreen1 sentence1986See Enslow v. Helmcke, 26 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mote
neutral
2 sentences2008The result in Brown is consistent with the other cases in which the officers made contact with citizens in a car because of a violation. ¶ 11 In accepting Brown, the trial court rejected State v. Mote, 129 Wash.App. 276 , 120 P.3d 596 (2005). 2008App. 276 , 120 P.3d 596 (2005). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Mote
green
2 sentences2008The result in Brown is consistent with the other cases in which the officers made contact with citizens in a car because of a violation. ¶ 11 In accepting Brown, the trial court rejected State v. Mote, 129 Wash.App. 276 , 120 P.3d 596 (2005). 2008The result in Brown is consistent with the other cases in which the officers made contact with citizens in a car because of a violation. ¶11 In accepting Brown, the trial court rejected State v. Mote, 129 Wn. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Ashcraft v. Wallingford
green
1 sentence1986App. 853, 856 , 565 P.2d 1224 (1977) regarding use of the following car doctrine in jury instructions. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Billington v. Schaal
green
2 sentences1984Szupkay cites Billington v. Schaal, 42 Wn.2d 878 , 259 P.2d 634 (1953) for the proposition that the following car doctrine applies even though the leading car has come to a complete stop. 1984Szupkay cites Billington v. Schaal, 42 Wn.2d 878 , 259 P.2d 634 (1953) for the proposition that the following car doctrine applies even though the leading car has come to a complete stop. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Vanwagenen v. Roy
neutral
1 sentence1980In Van *105 wagenen v. Roy, 21 Wn. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Hardman v. Younkers
green
2 sentences1971A similar “res ipsa loquitur” rule has been applied in “situations where a moving motor vehicle collided with a stationary vehicle alongside a curb.” Hardman v. Younkers, 15 Wn.2d 483, 491 , 131 P.2d, 177 , 151 A.L.R. 868 (1942). 1971A similar “res ipsa loquitur” rule has been applied in “situations where a moving motor vehicle collided with a stationary vehicle alongside a curb.” Hardman v. Younkers, 15 Wn.2d 483, 491 , 131 P.2d, 177 , 151 A.L.R. 868 (1942). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.