continuance is reversible error (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

continuance is reversible error in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Willapa Trading Co. v. Muscanto, Inc. green
washctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2025A “party does not have an absolute right to a continuance, and the granting or denial of a motion for a continuance is reversible error only if the ruling was a manifest abuse of discretion.” Willapa Trading Co., 4 Inc. v. Muscanto, Inc., 45 Wn. App. 779, 785 , 727 P.2d 687 (1986) (emphasis added).

2025A “party does not have an absolute right to a continuance, and the granting or denial of a motion for a continuance is reversible error only if the ruling was a manifest abuse of discretion.” Willapa Trading Co., 4 Inc. v. Muscanto, Inc., 45 Wn. App. 779, 785 , 727 P.2d 687 (1986) (emphasis added).

22019–2025
State v. Herzog green
washctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2014State v. Herzog, 69 Wn.

2013State v. Herzoq, 69 Wn.

22013–2014
Steven P. Kozol v. Washington State Dept. of Corrections green
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2025“Discretion is abused when it is exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” Kozol v. Dep’t of Corr., 192 Wn. App. 1, 6 , 366 P.3d 933 (2015).

2025“Discretion is abused when it is exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” Kozol v. Dep’t of Corr., 192 Wn. App. 1, 6 , 366 P.3d 933 (2015).

12025–2025
State v. Downing green
wash · 2004
2 sentences

2019"In exercising discretion to grant or deny a continuance, trial courts may consider many factors, including surprise, diligence, redundancy, due process, 9 materiality, and maintenance of orderly procedure." State v. Downing, 151 Wn.2d 265, 273 , 87 P.3d 1169 (2004).

2019"In exercising discretion to grant or deny a continuance, trial courts may consider many factors, including surprise, diligence, redundancy, due process, 9 materiality, and maintenance of orderly procedure." State v. Downing, 151 Wn.2d 265, 273 , 87 P.3d 1169 (2004).

12019–2019
Saunders v. Lloyd's of London green
wash · 1989
2 sentences

2013The denial of a continuance is reversible error only upon a showing of both an abuse of 7 Saunders v. Lloyd's of London, 113 Wn.2d 330, 345 , 779 P.2d 249 (1989) (appellate court will decline to consider issues unsupported by cogent legal argument and citation to relevant authority).

2013The denial of a continuance is reversible error only upon a showing of both an abuse of 7 Saunders v. Lloyd's of London, 113 Wn.2d 330, 345 , 779 P.2d 249 (1989) (appellate court will decline to consider issues unsupported by cogent legal argument and citation to relevant authority).

12013–2013
Cook v. Brateng green
washctapp · 2010
1 sentence

2013App. 777, 794 , 262 P.3d 1228 (2010). 10 The denial of a continuance is reversible error only upon a showing of both an abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice.

12013–2013
Martonik v. Durkan green
washctapp · 1979
1 sentence

1986Martonik v. Durkan, 23 Wn.

11986–1986
Bennett v. Bennett neutral
wash · 1963
2 sentences

1966Bennett v. Bennett, 63 Wn.2d 404 , 387 P.2d 517 (1963).

1966Bennett v. Bennett, 63 Wn.2d 404 , 387 P.2d 517 (1963).

11966–1966

Where else courts name it

FL 12 (1985–2026) WA 7 (1966–2025) IN 4 (1982–1993) MI 2 (1971–1978) GA 2 (1977–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check