Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ermine v. City of Spokanegreen1 sentence2016Ermine, 143 Wn.2d at 650 (emphasizing the deferential abuse of discretion standard applied in reviewing a court's decision to grant or deny attorney fees in a nominal damages case). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Woods
green
2 sentences2007Woods, 143 Wash.2d at 597-98 , 23 P.3d 1046 (citing State v. Briscoeray, 95 Wash.App. 167, 171 , 974 P.2d 912 (1999)). 2007Woods, 143 Wn.2d at 597 -98 (citing State v. Briscoeray, 95 Wn. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2007In Brown, we said: While we are sympathetic to the Court of Appeals' desire to defer to the trial court's evaluation of the complaining witness' credibility and hence ultimately of the [statement's] reliability, this approach has no place in the excited utterance rule. 127 Wash.2d at 758 , 903 P.2d 459 . ¶ 13 However, in 2001 we reaffirmed that the deferential abuse of discretion standard should be used in reviewing a trial court's decision to admit an excited utterance. 2007In Brown, we said: While we are sympathetic to the Court of Appeals’ desire to defer to the trial court’s evaluation of the complaining witness’ credibility and hence ultimately of the [statement’s] reliability, this approach has no place in the excited utterance rule. 127 Wn.2d at 758 . ¶16 However, in 2001 we reaffirmed that the deferential abuse of discretion standard should be used in reviewing a trial court’s decision to admit an excited utterance. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Briscoeray
green
2 sentences2007Woods, 143 Wash.2d at 597-98 , 23 P.3d 1046 (citing State v. Briscoeray, 95 Wash.App. 167, 171 , 974 P.2d 912 (1999)). 2007Woods, 143 Wn.2d at 597 -98 (citing State v. Briscoeray, 95 Wn. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Quaale
green
2 sentences2024State v. Quaale, 182 Wn.2d 191, 196 , 340 P.3d 213 (2014). 2024State v. Quaale, 182 Wn.2d 191, 196 , 340 P.3d 213 (2014). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
L.M. by and Through Dussault v. Hamilton
green
2 sentences2024L.M. by & through Dussault v. Hamilton, 193 Wn.2d 113 , 134- 35, 436 P.3d 803 (2019). 2024L.M. by & through Dussault v. Hamilton, 193 Wn.2d 113 , 134- 35, 436 P.3d 803 (2019). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Rainey
green
1 sentence2017Rainey, 168 Wn.2d at 374-75 ; State v. Howard, 182 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Howard
green
1 sentence2017Rainey, 168 Wn.2d at 374-75 ; State v. Howard, 182 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Woods
green
1 sentence2007Woods, 143 Wash.2d at 597-98 , 23 P.3d 1046 (citing State v. Briscoeray, 95 Wash.App. 167, 171 , 974 P.2d 912 (1999)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2007In Brown, we said: While we are sympathetic to the Court of Appeals' desire to defer to the trial court's evaluation of the complaining witness' credibility and hence ultimately of the [statement's] reliability, this approach has no place in the excited utterance rule. 127 Wash.2d at 758 , 903 P.2d 459 . ¶ 13 However, in 2001 we reaffirmed that the deferential abuse of discretion standard should be used in reviewing a trial court's decision to admit an excited utterance. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Marks
green
1 sentence1999Marks, 90 Wn. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.