Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Freehe v. Freehegreen2 sentences2003“This argument is wholly unpersuasive because the exclusion far exceeds the evil which it is designed to protect against; collusion and fraud are the exception rather than the rule.” Id. at 210 ; see also Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183, 189 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972) (rejecting the doctrine of intrafamily tort immunity in favor of individualized judicial determinations on issues which may involve intrafamily fraud or collusion). 2003“This argument is wholly unpersuasive because the exclusion far exceeds the evil which it is designed to protect against; collusion and fraud are the exception rather than the rule.” Id. at 210 ; see also Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183, 189 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972) (rejecting the doctrine of intrafamily tort immunity in favor of individualized judicial determinations on issues which may involve intrafamily fraud or collusion). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscomb
green
2 sentences2003"This argument is wholly unpersuasive because the exclusion far exceeds the evil which it is designed to protect against; collusion and fraud are the exception rather than the rule." Id. at 210 , 643 P.2d 441 ; See also Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wash.2d 183, 189 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972) (rejecting the doctrine of intrafamily tort immunity in favor of individualized judicial determinations on issues which may involve intrafamily fraud or collusion). 2003“This argument is wholly unpersuasive because the exclusion far exceeds the evil which it is designed to protect against; collusion and fraud are the exception rather than the rule.” Id. at 210 ; see also Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183, 189 , 500 P.2d 771 (1972) (rejecting the doctrine of intrafamily tort immunity in favor of individualized judicial determinations on issues which may involve intrafamily fraud or collusion). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Leo Gleason v. Brian And Liza Cohen
green
1 sentence2017Gleason v. Cohen, 192 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Dorr v. Big Creek Wood Products, Inc.
green
1 sentence2016Implied primary assumption of risk occupies a very “narrow niche.” Dorr, 84 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Leyendecker v. Cousins
green
1 sentence2016App. 769, 774 , 770 P.2d 675 (1989)). ¶18 Significantly, implied primary assumption of risk is the exception rather than the rule in assumption of risk situations. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Walter v. Everett School District No. 24
green
2 sentences1955No. 24, 195 Wash. 45 , 79 P. (2d) 689 . *38 “The general rule is that a party injured by the negligence of another must seek his remedy against the person who caused the injury, since such person is alone liable. 1955No. 24, 195 Wash. 45 , 79 P. (2d) 689 . *38 “The general rule is that a party injured by the negligence of another must seek his remedy against the person who caused the injury, since such person is alone liable. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Kepner v. United States
green
2 sentences1945In 1904, the supreme court of the United States rendered a decision in Kepner v. United States, 195 U. S. 100 , 49 L. 1945In 1904, the supreme court of the United States rendered a decision in Kepner v. United States, 195 U. S. 100 , 49 L. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
State v. Wright
neutral
2 sentences1944When fair trials were the exception rather than the rule, it was but natural that judges, having a sense of right and humanity, should hold the state to strict pleading and to a stricter proof; but in these times, when those charged with crime are protected by every constitutional and statutory guaranty of a fair trial that a sense of humanity can suggest, and by a general sentiment that no innocent man shall be convicted of crime — when education is general, and understanding of written words is common to all classes, there is no sound reason why the rigorous rule of the common law should be 1944When fair trials were the exception rather than the rule, it was but natural that judges, having a sense of right and humanity, should hold the state to strict pleading and to a stricter proof; but in these times, when those charged with crime are protected by every constitutional and statutory guaranty of a fair trial that a sense of humanity can suggest, and by a general sentiment that no innocent man shall be convicted of crime — when education is general, and understanding of written words is common to all classes, there is no sound reason why the rigorous rule of the common law should be | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.