Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Connollygreen2 sentences2015“Indeed, ‘evidentiary hearings on new trial motions in criminal cases are the exception rather than the rule.’ ” People v. McNeely, 222 P.3d 370, 377 (Colo.App.2009) (quoting United States v. Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir.2007)), overruled on other grounds by Gibbons v. People, 2014 CO 67 , 328 P.3d 95 . 2009Indeed, "evidentiary hearings on new trial motions in criminal cases are the exception rather than the rule." United States v. Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir.2007). | 2 | 2 |
Barber v. Pagegreen2 sentences1983See, e.g., Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); United States v. Wilson, supra. Unavailability within the context of Crim.P. 15(e) is to be determined at the time of trial in light of the circumstances then existing. 1983See, e.g., Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); United States v. Wilson, supra. Unavailability within the context of Crim.P. 15(e) is to be determined at the time of trial in light of the circumstances then existing. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gaskinsgreen1 sentence2024See generally Wells-Yates, ¶¶ 23-27, 454 P.3d at 201-02; see also, e.g. , Gaskins, 825 P.2d at 36-37 ; Rutter , ¶ 15, 363 P.3d at 188 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. McNeelygreen1 sentence2015“Indeed, ‘evidentiary hearings on new trial motions in criminal cases are the exception rather than the rule.’ ” People v. McNeely, 222 P.3d 370, 377 (Colo.App.2009) (quoting United States v. Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir.2007)), overruled on other grounds by Gibbons v. People, 2014 CO 67 , 328 P.3d 95 . | 1 | 1 |
Herndon v. Lowrygreen2 sentences1944Justice Roberts, speaking for the court in Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242, 258 (57 Sup. Ct. 732, 81 L.Ed. 1066 ), said: “The power of a state to abridge freedom of speech and of assembly is the exception rather than the rule * * * The judgment of the legislature is not unfettered. 1944Justice Roberts, speaking for the court in Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242, 258 (57 Sup. Ct. 732, 81 L.Ed. 1066 ), said: “The power of a state to abridge freedom of speech and of assembly is the exception rather than the rule * * * The judgment of the legislature is not unfettered. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Thomas Wilson and John MacGregor
green
2 sentences1983See, e.g., Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); United States v. Wilson, supra. Unavailability within the context of Crim.P. 15(e) is to be determined at the time of trial in light of the circumstances then existing. 1983See, e.g., Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); United States v. Wilson, supra . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Rutter v. People
green
1 sentence2024See generally Wells-Yates, ¶¶ 23-27, 454 P.3d at 201-02; see also, e.g. , Gaskins, 825 P.2d at 36-37 ; Rutter , ¶ 15, 363 P.3d at 188 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Gibbons v. People
green
2 sentences2015“Indeed, ‘evidentiary hearings on new trial motions in criminal cases are the exception rather than the rule.’ ” People v. McNeely, 222 P.3d 370, 377 (Colo.App.2009) (quoting United States v. Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir.2007)), overruled on other grounds by Gibbons v. People, 2014 CO 67 , 328 P.3d 95 . 2015“Indeed, ‘evidentiary hearings on new trial motions in criminal cases are the exception rather than the rule.’ ” People v. McNeely, 222 P.3d 370, 377 (Colo.App.2009) (quoting United States v. Connolly, 504 F.3d 206, 220 (1st Cir.2007)), overruled on other grounds by Gibbons v. People, 2014 CO 67 , 328 P.3d 95 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.