fact-based inquiry in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Elliottgreen wash · 1990 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2016 2 sentences 2016See State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the same criminal conduct determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”). ¶4 Chenoweth argues that child rape and incest, based on a single act, as a matter of law constitute the same criminal conduct for purposes of calculating his offender score. 2016See State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the same criminal conduct determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”). ¶4 Chenoweth argues that child rape and incest, based on a single act, as a matter of law constitute the same criminal conduct for purposes of calculating his offender score.	1	2
State v. Maxfieldgreen wash · 1994 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 2 sentences 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	1
State v. Portergreen wash · 1997 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	1
State v. Portergreen wash · 1997 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Graciano green wash · 2013 2 sentences 2019“In keeping with this fact-based inquiry, we have repeatedly observed that a court’s determination of same criminal conduct will not be disturbed unless the sentencing court abuses its discretion or misapplies the law.” Id. 2019Graciano, 176 Wn.2d at 536 - 37.	2	2019–2019
State v. Warren green wash · 2008 1 sentence 2019App. 424, 437-44 , 997 P.2d 436 (2000); State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 31-35 , 195 P.3d 940 (2008).	1	2019–2019
State v. Letourneau green washctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2019App. 424, 437-44 , 997 P.2d 436 (2000); State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 31-35 , 195 P.3d 940 (2008).	1	2019–2019
State v. Warren green wash · 2008 1 sentence 2019App. 424, 437-44 , 997 P.2d 436 (2000); State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 31-35 , 195 P.3d 940 (2008).	1	2019–2019
State v. Letourneau green washctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2019When reviewing whether a no-contact order with a defendant’s own children is appropriate, we conduct a fact-based inquiry, weighing the State’s compelling interest in preventing harm to children against the defendant’s fundamental right to raise their children without State interference. ~ State v. Letourneau, 100 Wn.	1	2019–2019
Attorney General's Office v. Utilities & Transportation Commission green washctapp · 2005 1 sentence 2017Attorney Gen.’s Office, 128 Wn.	1	2017–2017
State v. Williams green wash · 1998 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Tili green wash · 1999 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Tili green wash · 1999 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Walden green washctapp · 1993 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Williams green wash · 1998 1 sentence 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Burns green wash · 1990 2 sentences 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r 2013E.g., State v. Elliott, 114 Wn.2d 6, 17 , 785 P.2d 440 (1990) (affirming the petitioner’s sentence where the “same criminal conduct” determination involved “neither a clear abuse of discretion nor a misapplication of the law”); State v. Burns, 114 Wn.2d 314, 317 , 788 P.2d 531 (1990) (noting the same criminal conduct determination will not be disturbed unless an appellate court “finds a clear abuse of discretion or misapplication of the law”); State v. Maxfield, 125 Wn.2d 378, 402 , 886 P.2d 123 (1994) (“The trial court’s determination whether two offenses require the same criminal intent is r	1	2013–2013
State v. Randhawa green wash · 1997 1 sentence 2007This argument also fails. ¶22 First, T.M. relies on State v. Randhawa, 133 Wn.2d 67 , 941 P.2d 661 (1997).	1	2007–2007
State v. Randhawa green wash · 1997 1 sentence 2007This argument also fails. ¶22 First, T.M. relies on State v. Randhawa, 133 Wn.2d 67 , 941 P.2d 661 (1997).	1	2007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.589 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 65 (1994–2026) CA 29 (1991–2026) IL 24 (2002–2026) NY 20 (1994–2026) PA 16 (1997–2026) OR 14 (1997–2025) TX 12 (2010–2022) DC 12 (1991–2021) OH 11 (1999–2018) IA 10 (2018–2022) NM 8 (1994–2024) VA 7 (2002–2026) MA 7 (1997–2023) WA 7 (2007–2019) NC 6 (2012–2020) CO 6 (2010–2026) FL 6 (1996–2015) MN 6 (1990–2025) MI 5 (2017–2022) UT 5 (2015–2023) KS 4 (2007–2023) SC 4 (2008–2017) LA 3 (1995–2006) DE 3 (2020–2025) MD 3 (2008–2010) GA 3 (2016–2025) ME 2 (1995–2020) OK 2 (1990–2018) NE 2 (2019–2019) NJ 2 (1987–2001) AR 2 (2011–2011) MO 2 (2012–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check