has followed rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

has followed rule in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1906–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (17)

CaseCitedYears
Hansen v. Friend green
wash · 1992
2 sentences

1995RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 286 (1965), quoted in Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wn.2d 476, 480-81 , 824 P.2d 483 (1992).

1995RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 286 (1965), quoted in Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wn.2d 476, 480-81 , 824 P.2d 483 (1992).

11995–1995
State v. Allen green
wash · 1978
2 sentences

1988State v. Allen, 89 Wn.2d 651, 654 , 574 P.2d 1182 (1978); State v. Cushing, 14 Wash. 527, 533 , 45 P. 145 (1896); see 23A C.J.S.

1988State v. Allen, 89 Wn.2d 651, 654 , 574 P.2d 1182 (1978); State v. Cushing, 14 Wash. 527, 533 , 45 P. 145 (1896); see 23A C.J.S.

11988–1988
State v. Cushing neutral
wash · 1896
2 sentences

1988State v. Allen, 89 Wn.2d 651, 654 , 574 P.2d 1182 (1978); State v. Cushing, 14 Wash. 527, 533 , 45 P. 145 (1896); see 23A C.J.S.

1988State v. Allen, 89 Wn.2d 651, 654 , 574 P.2d 1182 (1978); State v. Cushing, 14 Wash. 527, 533 , 45 P. 145 (1896); see 23A C.J.S.

11988–1988
Conaway v. Co-Operative Homebuilders green
· 1911
2 sentences

1941Conaway v. Co-operative Homebuilders, 65 Wash. 39 , 117 Pac. 716 ; Roberts v. Pacific Tel. & Tel.

1941Conaway v. Co-operative Homebuilders, 65 Wash. 39 , 117 Pac. 716 ; Roberts v. Pacific Tel. & Tel.

11941–1941
Hanson v. Roesch neutral
wash · 1918
2 sentences

1935In Hanson v. Roesch, 104 Wash. 257 , 176 Pac. 349 , it was said: “The rule is elementary that, where a dormant partner permits the business world to believe that the ostensible partners are the owners of the business, he is estopped from claiming to the contrary against those who have in good faith acted upon such appearance, and cannot be heard to insist that, under such circumstances, a creditor has not the rig'ht to set off his debt against such partnership.” It is also the rule that a retiring partner who permits property in which he has an unliquidated interest to remain in the possession

1935In Hanson v. Roesch, 104 Wash. 257 , 176 Pac. 349 , it was said: “The rule is elementary that, where a dormant partner permits the business world to believe that the ostensible partners are the owners of the business, he is estopped from claiming to the contrary against those who have in good faith acted upon such appearance, and cannot be heard to insist that, under such circumstances, a creditor has not the rig'ht to set off his debt against such partnership.” It is also the rule that a retiring partner who permits property in which he has an unliquidated interest to remain in the possession

11935–1935
Hart v. King County green
wash · 1918
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Woody v. Port of Seattle neutral
wash · 1922
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Raine v. Port of Seattle neutral
wash · 1922
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co. green
wash · 1933
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
State ex rel. Jackson v. King County neutral
wash · 1902
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Anderson Steamboat Co. v. County of King neutral
wash · 1915
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Bergen v. Lewis County neutral
wash · 1917
2 sentences

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

1935Jackson v. King County, 29 Wash. 359 , 69 Pac. 1106 , decided in 1902, this court has followed the rule there laid down that such contracts of counties delegating ferry age powers have been upheld; citing’ Anderson Steamboat Co. v. King County, 84 Wash. 375 , 146 Pac. 855 ; Bergen v. Lewis County, 95 Wash. 499 , 164 Pac. 73 ; Hart v. King County, 104 Wash. 485 , 177 Pac. 344 ; Woody v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 163 , 203 Pac. 59 ; Raine v. Port of Seattle, 118 Wash. 168 , 203 Pac. 61 ; Pierce County v. Washington Navigation Co., 175 Wash. 344 , 27 P. (2d) 569 .

11935–1935
Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Burton neutral
wash · 1899
2 sentences

1923Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Burton, 20 Wash. 688 , 56 Pac. 940 ; Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co., 71 Wash. 225 , 128 Pac. 211 .

1923Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Burton, 20 Wash. 688 , 56 Pac. 940 ; Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co., 71 Wash. 225 , 128 Pac. 211 .

11923–1923
Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co. green
wash · 1912
2 sentences

1923Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Burton, 20 Wash. 688 , 56 Pac. 940 ; Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co., 71 Wash. 225 , 128 Pac. 211 .

1923Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Burton, 20 Wash. 688 , 56 Pac. 940 ; Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co., 71 Wash. 225 , 128 Pac. 211 .

11923–1923
State v. Armstrong green
utah · 1905
2 sentences

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

11906–1906
Griffith v. Ridpath neutral
wash · 1905
2 sentences

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

11906–1906
State v. Mann green
wash · 1905
2 sentences

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

1906State v. Mann, 39 Wash. 144 , 81 Pac. 561 ; Griffith v. Ridpath, 38 Wash. 540 , 80 Pac. 820 ; State v. Armstrong, 37 Wash. 51 , 79 Pac. 490 .

11906–1906

Where else courts name it

OK 14 (1922–1970) MS 10 (1962–2017) PA 8 (1898–2000) MI 8 (1901–2020) WA 7 (1906–1995) IL 7 (1921–2000) MT 7 (1976–2009) ID 6 (1912–2014) KY 6 (1900–2018) AZ 6 (1962–1990) OR 6 (1944–1996) AL 6 (1911–2005) OH 6 (2006–2022) ND 6 (1950–2008) MO 5 (1891–2011) TN 5 (1927–1994) WI 4 (1956–1981) NE 4 (1929–1980) GA 4 (1977–1997) SD 4 (1932–1984) TX 3 (1954–1987) WY 3 (1978–2000) NY 3 (1934–2007) WV 3 (1909–1950) FL 3 (1964–1988) NC 2 (2011–2015) IN 2 (1955–1971) DC 2 (1970–1986) KS 2 (1896–1967) CT 2 (1949–1988) CO 2 (1960–1992) IA 2 (1935–1979) AR 2 (1987–2010) MN 2 (1934–1954) MD 2 (1900–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check