has long rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

has long rule in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Apostle v. Lillionsgreen
wash · 1941 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See Apostle v. Lillions, 8Wn.2d 118, 121, 111 P.2d 789 (1941); Dellerv.

11
O'Toole v. Faulknergreen
wash · 1902 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See O'Toole v. Faulkner, 29 Wash. 544, 548 , 70 P. 58 (1902) (failure to state a claim for relief could be raised for first time in the supreme court per statute).

2016See O'Toole v. Faulkner, 29 Wash. 544, 548 , 70 P. 58 (1902) (failure to state a claim for relief could be raised for first time in the supreme court per statute).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Armendariz green
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2008Armendariz, 160 Wash.2d at 110 , 156 P.3d 201 . ¶ 13 This has long been the rule.

2008Armendariz, 160 Wn.2d at 110 . ¶13 This has long been the rule.

22008–2008
Hunsley v. Giard green
wash · 1976
2 sentences

2015Hunsley v. Giard, 87 Wn.2d 424,435 , 553 P.2d 1096 (1976).

2015Hunsley v. Giard, 87 Wn.2d 424,435 , 553 P.2d 1096 (1976).

12015–2015
State v. Martin green
wash · 1980
1 sentence

2008In Martin, for example, our Supreme Court declined to imply the existence of a special sentencing provision by which the death penalty could be imposed in a guilty plea case where a statute specifically required that the trial jury be reconvened and charged with deciding the question of death. 94 Wn.2d at 7-9 . 13 The court reasoned that the plain language of the death penalty statute foreclosed the possibility of impaneling a special jury when a defendant pleaded guilty: Clearly the legislature did not anticipate the possibility that an accused might plead guilty to a charge of first degree m

12008–2008
State v. Armendariz green
wash · 2007
1 sentence

2008Armendariz, 160 Wash.2d at 110 , 156 P.3d 201 . ¶ 13 This has long been the rule.

12008–2008
Galanos v. United States green
ca6 · 1931
2 sentences

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir. 1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

11979–1979
Smith v. State green
gactapp · 1942
2 sentences

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

11979–1979
People v. Criscuoli green
nyappdiv · 1914
2 sentences

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

11979–1979
United States v. Loretta Wall green
ca6 · 1967
2 sentences

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir. 1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

11979–1979
People v. Pearson neutral
illappct · 1968
2 sentences

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir. 1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

1979United States v. Wall, 371 F.2d 398 (6th Cir.1967); Galanos v. United States, 49 F.2d 898 (6th Cir.1931); Smith v. State, 66 Ga. App. 669 , 19 S.E.2d 168 (1942); People v. Criscuoli, 164 App. Div. 119 , 149 N.Y.S. 819 (1914); People v. Pearson, 98 Ill.

11979–1979
Rood v. Horton green
wash · 1924
2 sentences

1960Rood v. Horton (1924), 132 Wash. 82, 89 , 231 Pac. 450 .

1960Rood v. Horton (1924), 132 Wash. 82, 89 , 231 Pac. 450 .

11960–1960

Where else courts name it

CA 10 (1931–2026) IN 10 (1905–2006) GA 9 (1955–2010) OK 8 (1916–2006) IL 8 (1880–1989) NE 7 (1927–1993) WA 7 (1960–2020) MO 7 (1902–2015) KY 6 (1945–2024) TX 6 (1933–2003) NY 5 (1926–1980) MN 5 (1926–2002) KS 5 (1965–1988) MT 4 (1952–1972) VT 4 (1907–2003) FL 4 (1981–2001) PA 4 (1867–1978) AL 4 (1937–1987) IA 4 (1908–1992) MA 3 (1971–1978) NC 3 (1983–2021) OH 2 (1998–2007) MS 2 (2004–2006) MI 2 (2022–2023) NM 2 (1983–1993) CT 2 (1929–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check