has long rule (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

has long rule in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1965–1988 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.green
kan · 1954 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988See Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 176 Kan. 433 , 271 P.2d 773 (1954).

1988See Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 176 Kan. 433 , 271 P.2d 773 (1954).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Allen v. Brown green
kan · 1957
2 sentences

1975In Allen v. Brown, 181 Kan. 301 , 310 P. 2d 923 , a case involving breach of a new automobile warranty, we held: “The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the loss directly and naturally resulting from the breach of warranty.

1975In Allen v. Brown, 181 Kan. 301 , 310 P. 2d 923 , a case involving breach of a new automobile warranty, we held: “The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the loss directly and naturally resulting from the breach of warranty.

11975–1975
Kirts v. Board of County Commissioners neutral
kan · 1950
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
State v. Burnett green
kan · 1964
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule with respect to retained counsel (Miller v. Hudspeth, supra. Syl. ¶ 14), and the administration of criminal justice dictates a similar rule where counsel is court appointed.” (1. c. 699.) See, also, State v. Spain, 193 Kan. 1 , 391 P. 2d 1001 ; State v. Robertson, supra, and State v. Burnett, 194 Kan. 126, 131 , 397 P. 2d 346 .

1966This has long been the rule with respect to retained counsel (Miller v. Hudspeth, supra. Syl. ¶ 14), and the administration of criminal justice dictates a similar rule where counsel is court appointed.” (1. c. 699.) See, also, State v. Spain, 193 Kan. 1 , 391 P. 2d 1001 ; State v. Robertson, supra, and State v. Burnett, 194 Kan. 126, 131 , 397 P. 2d 346 .

11966–1966
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Wilson neutral
kan · 1885
1 sentence

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
City of Topeka v. Dwyer green
kan · 1904
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

11966–1966
Chaves v. City of Atchison neutral
kan · 1908
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

11966–1966
Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County Commissioners neutral
kan · 1913
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
Euler v. Rossville Drainage District neutral
kan · 1925
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
Wellman v. City of Burr Oak neutral
kan · 1928
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

11966–1966
Scamahorn v. Perry neutral
kan · 1931
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
Shaffer v. Board of County Commissioners neutral
kan · 1931
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
Kimmel v. Wolf River Drainage District neutral
kan · 1933
2 sentences

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
School District No. 14 v. Board of County Commissioners neutral
kan · 1941
1 sentence

1966R. 2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (A. T. & S. F. Rld Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223 , 6 Pac. 281 ; Scamahorn v. Ferry, 132 Kan. 679 , 296 Pac. 347 ; Shaffer v. Ford County Comm'rs, 133 Kan. 256 , 299 Pac. 613 ; School District v. Shawnee County Comm'rs, 153 Kan. 281 , 110 Pac. 744 ; Kirts v. Miami County Comm’rs, 168 Kan. 739 , 215 P. 2d 642 ), or of claims that drainage districts were illegally or invalidly organized (Railroad Co. v. Leavenworth County, 89 Kan. 72 , 130 Pac. 855 ; Euler v. Rossville Drainage District, 118 Kan. 363 , 2

11966–1966
Smith v. City of Emporia green
kan · 1949
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

1966This has long been the rule in this state with respect to the corporate organization or reorganization of cities (Topeka v. Dwyer, 70 Kan. 244 , 78 Pac. 417 ; Chaves v. Atchison, 77 Kan. 176 , 93 Pac. 624 ; Wellman v. City of Burr Oak, 124 Kan. 780 , 262 Pac. 607 ; Smith v. City of Emporia, 168 Kan. 187 , 211 P. 2d 101 , 13 A. L.

11966–1966
State v. Spain green
kan · 1964
2 sentences

1966This has long been the rule with respect to retained counsel (Miller v. Hudspeth, supra. Syl. ¶ 14), and the administration of criminal justice dictates a similar rule where counsel is court appointed.” (1. c. 699.) See, also, State v. Spain, 193 Kan. 1 , 391 P. 2d 1001 ; State v. Robertson, supra, and State v. Burnett, 194 Kan. 126, 131 , 397 P. 2d 346 .

1966This has long been the rule with respect to retained counsel (Miller v. Hudspeth, supra. Syl. ¶ 14), and the administration of criminal justice dictates a similar rule where counsel is court appointed.” (1. c. 699.) See, also, State v. Spain, 193 Kan. 1 , 391 P. 2d 1001 ; State v. Robertson, supra, and State v. Burnett, 194 Kan. 126, 131 , 397 P. 2d 346 .

11966–1966
Uhock v. Hand neutral
kan · 1958
2 sentences

1965This has long been the rule in Kansas in habeas corpus cases (Uhock v. Hand, 182 Kan. 419 [ 320 P. 2d 794 ] at 426), and is equally applicable to hearings under Section 60-1507 of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure.

1965This has long been the rule in Kansas in habeas corpus cases (Uhock v. Hand, 182 Kan. 419 [ 320 P. 2d 794 ] at 426), and is equally applicable to hearings under Section 60-1507 of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure.

11965–1965

Where else courts name it

IN 10 (1905–2006) CA 10 (1931–2026) GA 9 (1955–2010) IL 8 (1880–1989) OK 8 (1916–2006) WA 7 (1960–2020) MO 7 (1902–2015) NE 7 (1927–1993) KY 6 (1945–2024) TX 6 (1933–2003) NY 5 (1926–1980) KS 5 (1965–1988) MN 5 (1926–2002) NC 4 (1938–2021) IA 4 (1908–1992) PA 4 (1867–1978) MT 4 (1952–1972) AL 4 (1937–1987) FL 4 (1981–2001) MA 3 (1971–1978) VT 3 (1936–2003) NM 2 (1983–1993) CT 2 (1929–2000) MI 2 (2022–2023) OH 2 (1998–2007) MS 2 (2004–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check