Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jessupgreen2 sentences2014State v. Jessup, 31 Wn. 2014State v. Jessup, 31 Wn. | 2 | 4 |
United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, Defendantsgreen2 sentences1996United States v. Bogart, 783 F.2d 1428, 1435 (9th Cir. 1986), vacated on other grounds with respect to one defendant sub nom. 1996United States v. Bogart, 783 F.2d 1428, 1435 (9th Cir.1986), vacated on other grounds with respect to one defendant sub nom. | 2 | 2 |
State v. O'NEILLgreen1 sentence2012See State v. O'Neill, 91 Wash.App. 978, 987-88 , 967 P.2d 985 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
State v. O'NEILLgreen1 sentence2012See State v. O'Neill, 91 Wash.App. 978, 987-88 , 967 P.2d 985 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2012RCW 34.05.586(1); see State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 42-43 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984). 2012RCW 34.05.586(1); see State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 42-43 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rundquist
green
2 sentences1996Even if this court were to accept an outrageous conduct defense, the facts of this case do not demonstrate "the most egregious situation.” Rundquist, 79 Wn. 1996Even if this court were to accept an outrageous conduct defense, the facts of this case do not demonstrate "the most egregious situation." Rundquist, 79 Wash.App. at 797 , 905 P.2d 922 . | 2 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Shannon
green
2 sentences1996Shannon, 892 S.W.2d at 766 . 1996Shannon, 892 S.W.2d at 766 . | 2 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Markwart
green
1 sentence2016State v. Markwart, 182 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.