Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baker v. CITY SEATTLEgreen2 sentences2025Johnson, 150 Wn. App. at 538 (citing Baker, 79 Wn.2d at 202 , McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83 , Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 , and Stokes, 113 Wn. App. at 448 ). 2021See Baker v. City of Seattle, 79 Wn.2d 198, 202 , 484 P.2d 405 (1971); McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83-84 ; Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 ; Stokes v. Bally's Pacwest, Inc., 113 Wn. App. 442, 448 , 54 P.3d 161 (2002). | 6 | 7 |
Stokes v. Bally's Pacwest, Inc.green2 sentences2021Stokes v. Bally’s Pacwest, Inc., 113 Wn. App. 442, 448 , 54 P.3d 161 (2002)(“The language is conspicuous, as a matter of law, and it was not unwittingly signed.”). 54400-8-II provision is set off in capital letters or in bold type, (4) whether there is a signature line below the waiver provision, (5) what the language says above the signature line, and (6) whether it is clear that the signature is related to the waiver provision. 2021Stokes v. Bally’s Pacwest, Inc., 113 Wn. App. 442, 448 , 54 P.3d 161 (2002)(“The language is conspicuous, as a matter of law, and it was not unwittingly signed.”). 54400-8-II provision is set off in capital letters or in bold type, (4) whether there is a signature line below the waiver provision, (5) what the language says above the signature line, and (6) whether it is clear that the signature is related to the waiver provision. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCorkle v. Hall
green
2 sentences2025Johnson, 150 Wn. App. at 538 (citing Baker, 79 Wn.2d at 202 , McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83 , Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 , and Stokes, 113 Wn. App. at 448 ). 2021See Baker v. City of Seattle, 79 Wn.2d 198, 202 , 484 P.2d 405 (1971); McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83-84 ; Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 ; Stokes v. Bally's Pacwest, Inc., 113 Wn. App. 442, 448 , 54 P.3d 161 (2002). | 7 | 2009–2025 |
Chauvlier v. Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc.
green
2 sentences2025Johnson, 150 Wn. App. at 538 (citing Baker, 79 Wn.2d at 202 , McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83 , Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 , and Stokes, 113 Wn. App. at 448 ). 2021See Baker v. City of Seattle, 79 Wn.2d 198, 202 , 484 P.2d 405 (1971); McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83-84 ; Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 ; Stokes v. Bally's Pacwest, Inc., 113 Wn. App. 442, 448 , 54 P.3d 161 (2002). | 3 | 2009–2025 |
Johnson v. Ubar, LLC
green
1 sentence2025Johnson, 150 Wn. App. at 538 (citing Baker, 79 Wn.2d at 202 , McCorkle, 56 Wn. App. at 83 , Chauvlier, 109 Wn. App. at 342 , and Stokes, 113 Wn. App. at 448 ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.