Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Jones, 118 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Scoby
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Grimes v. Allied Stores Corp.
green
2 sentences2005The court relied on Grimes v. Allied Stores Corp., 53 Wn. 2005The court relied on Grimes v. Allied Stores Corporation, 53 Wash.App. 554 , 768 P.2d 528 (1989), for the proposition that employee handbooks may contractually modify a written contract for terminable at-will employment provided the formalities of contract formation are satisfied. ¶ 42 DynCorp contends that Korslund's signing the application stating that his employment was at will precludes his justifiable reliance on promises in employee policy manuals as a matter of law. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Swanson v. Liquid Air Corporation
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Co., 136 Wn.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wn.2d at 525 ; Gaglidari v. Denny’s Rests., Inc., 117 Wn.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wn.2d at 229-30 . ¶34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. 2005Co., 136 Wash.2d 26, 34-36 , 959 P.2d 1104 (1998); Swanson, 118 Wash.2d at 525 , 826 P.2d 664 ; Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc., 117 Wash.2d 426, 433 , 815 P.2d 1362 (1991); Thompson, 102 Wash.2d at 229-30 , 685 P.2d 1081 . ¶ 34 DynCorp first contends that a specific treatment claim can be brought only when the employee is discharged. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Marintorres
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 451 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re WINSHIP
green
2 sentences2012The United States Supreme Court first applied the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal cases to the states in In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 25 L. 2012The United States Supreme Court first applied the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal cases to the states in In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 25 L. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Cawdrey v. HANSON BAKER LUDLOW DRUMHELLER
green
1 sentence2006The purpose of the rule is to give attorneys an opportunity to remedy their errors, establish that there was no error, or attempt to mitigate *635 the damage caused by their errors, while still allowing the aggrieved client the right to later bring a malpractice action." Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S., 129 Wash.App. 810, 819 , 120 P.3d 605 (2005). ¶ 20 The limitation of the rule in Janicki and Cawdrey to representation in specific matters is consistent with the treatment of the rule by Mallen and Smith. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S.
green
1 sentence2006The purpose of the rule is to give attorneys an opportunity to remedy their errors, establish that there was no error, or attempt to mitigate *635 the damage caused by their errors, while still allowing the aggrieved client the right to later bring a malpractice action." Cawdrey v. Hanson Baker Ludlow Drumheller, P.S., 129 Wash.App. 810, 819 , 120 P.3d 605 (2005). ¶ 20 The limitation of the rule in Janicki and Cawdrey to representation in specific matters is consistent with the treatment of the rule by Mallen and Smith. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Estrella
green
2 sentences1992Although the majority's treatment of the requirement of "substantial and compelling" does not distort case law, it ignores a limitation expressly articulated by the Washington Supreme Court in State v. Estrella, 115 Wn.2d 350, 798 P.2d 289 (1990). 1992Although the majority's treatment of the requirement of "substantial and compelling" does not distort case law, it ignores a limitation expressly articulated by the Washington Supreme Court in State v. Estrella, 115 Wn.2d 350, 798 P.2d 289 (1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.