Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riley v. Cal. United Statesgreen2 sentences2019Id. at 579-80, 587. 2019Id. at 579-80, 587. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gauthier
green
2 sentences2016App. 257 , 298 P.3d 126 (20 13 ), the trial court in each case held the defendants had a constitutional right to refuse consent to the warrantless breath test. 2016App. 257 , 298 P.3d 126 (2013), the trial court in each case held the defendants had a constitutional right to refuse consent to the warrantless breath test. | 4 | 2015–2016 |
State v. Curran
red
2 sentences2016Br. of Pet’r at 15 (citing State v. Curran, 116 Wn.2d 174, 184-85 , 804 P.2d 558 (1991)). 2016Br. of Pet’r at 15 (citing State v. Curran, 116 Wn.2d 174, 184-85 , 804 P.2d 558 (1991)). | 3 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Gunwall
green
2 sentences2024Under RAP 2.5(a), we will not review claims not raised before the trial court unless the party seeking review demonstrates a manifest error affecting a constitutional right. 5 Troutman correctly notes that she did not need to brief an analysis under State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986), because the Washington Supreme Court has already held that article I, section 7 provides privacy protection more extensive than the Fourth Amendment. 2024Under RAP 2.5(a), we will not review claims not raised before the trial court unless the party seeking review demonstrates a manifest error affecting a constitutional right. 5 Troutman correctly notes that she did not need to brief an analysis under State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986), because the Washington Supreme Court has already held that article I, section 7 provides privacy protection more extensive than the Fourth Amendment. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2016State v. Jones, 168 Wn.2d 713, 725 , 230 P.3d 576 (2010). ¶65 The lead opinion therefore also errs in claiming that even if a warrantless breath test were unconstitutional, our implied consent law would still function as a waiver of any challenge to admissibility. 2016State v. Jones, 168 Wn.2d 713, 725 , 230 P.3d 576 (2010). ¶65 The lead opinion therefore also errs in claiming that even if a warrantless breath test were unconstitutional, our implied consent law would still function as a waiver of any challenge to admissibility. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.