6 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Champion v. Department of Public Safetygreen2 sentences1989Safety, 721 P.2d 131, 133 (Alaska 1986) (to deny a driver a reasonable opportunity to test the reliability and credibility of evidence of central importance in the administrative license revocation proceeding is to deny “a meaningful and fundamentally fair hearing”); Graham v. State, 633 P.2d 211 , 216 n. 12 (Alaska 1981) (meaningful hearing requires presence of arresting officer where grounds for officer’s belief that person was operating vehicle while intoxicated is at issue). 15 . 1987Id. at 133 (citations and footnote omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchoragegreen2 sentences2012Id. at 675-77 . 1994See Gundersen v. Anchorage, 792 P.2d 673, 676 (Alaska 1990) (“Since a defendant must provide the state with potentially incriminating evidence at the risk of criminal penalties, we hold that due process requires that the defendant be given an opportunity to challenge the reliability of that evidence in the simplest and most effective way possible, that is, an independent test.”). | 1 | 2 |
Lau v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Lau v. State, 896 P.2d 825, 828 (Alaska App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Graham v. State
green
1 sentence1989Safety, 721 P.2d 131, 133 (Alaska 1986) (to deny a driver a reasonable opportunity to test the reliability and credibility of evidence of central importance in the administrative license revocation proceeding is to deny “a meaningful and fundamentally fair hearing”); Graham v. State, 633 P.2d 211 , 216 n. 12 (Alaska 1981) (meaningful hearing requires presence of arresting officer where grounds for officer’s belief that person was operating vehicle while intoxicated is at issue). 15 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.