Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1931–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cook v. Meyer Bros.green1 sentence2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation | 1 | 1 |
Christopher v. Christophergreen1 sentence2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation | 1 | 1 |
Dennis v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation 2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation | 1 | 1 |
Weaver v. Hollisgreen2 sentences2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation 2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation | 1 | 1 |
Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birminghamgreen2 sentences2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation 2023Dennis v. State, 40 Ala. App. 182, 185 , 111 So. 2d 21, 24 (1959); see also Weaver v. Hollis, 247 Ala. 57, 60 , 22 So. 2d 525, 528 (1945) (noting that statutes must be read 'in the light of the common law'); Standard Oil Co. v. City of Birmingham, 202 Ala. 97, 98 , 79 So. 489, 490 (1918) ('[C]ommon-law words [are to be construed] according to their common-law meaning.'); Cook v. Meyer Bros., 73 Ala. 580, 583 (1883) ('[T]he common law prevails, save so far as it is expressly or by necessary implication changed by the statute.'); Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Johnsongreen1 sentence1990See Ex parte Johnson, 474 So.2d 715 (Ala.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Beasley
green
2 sentences2001Moreover, the age-old principle that, as against a challenge by a nonparent, a parent who is neither unfit nor guilty of forfeiting his or her parental rights is entitled to custody *721 has been strengthened rather than weakened by the 1984 adoption of the Uniform Child Protection Act[, § 26-18-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975]." Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 952 . 2001Moreover, the age-old principle that, as against a challenge by a nonparent, a parent who is neither unfit nor guilty of forfeiting his or her parental rights is entitled to custody has been strengthened rather than weakened by the 1984 adoption of the Uniform Child Protection Act[, § 26-18-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975].” Ex parte Beasley, 564 So.2d at 952 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Ogle v. Gordon
green
2 sentences2010Perhaps it did so merely because in Ogle that date was one and the same as the date on which the wrongful-death action was filed. 706 So.2d at 708 . 2010Perhaps it did so merely because in Ogle that date was one and the same as the date on which the wrongful-death action was filed. 706 So.2d at 708 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Schenher v. State
neutral
2 sentences1979Schenher v. State, 38 Ala.App. 573 , 90 So.2d 234 , cert. denied, 265 Ala. 700 , 90 So.2d 238 (1956). 1979Schenher v. State, 38 Ala.App. 573 , 90 So.2d 234 , cert. denied, 265 Ala. 700 , 90 So.2d 238 (1956). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Schenher v. State
green
2 sentences1979Schenher v. State, 38 Ala.App. 573 , 90 So.2d 234 , cert. denied, 265 Ala. 700 , 90 So.2d 238 (1956). 1979Schenher v. State, 38 Ala.App. 573 , 90 So.2d 234 , cert. denied, 265 Ala. 700 , 90 So.2d 238 (1956). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
McDaniels v. State
neutral
2 sentences1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . 1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Moon v. State
green
2 sentences1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . 1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Spelce v. State
neutral
2 sentences1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . 1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Tidwell v. State
green
2 sentences1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . 1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Ammons v. State
green
2 sentences1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . 1931Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176 , 95 So. 830 ; Spelce v. State, 17 Ala. App. 401 , 85 So. 835 ; Tidwell v. State, 23 Ala. App. 409 , 126 So. 186 ; Ammons v. State, 20 Ala. App. 283 , 101 So. 511 ; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25 , 50 So. 324 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.