Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dale Motels, Inc. v. Crittendengreen2 sentences2007See 50 Ala.App. at 255 , 278 So.2d at 372 . [2] Ragland , like Dale Motels, was decided using the certiorari standard of review. 2007See 50 Ala.App. at 255 , 278 So.2d at 372 . [2] Ragland , like Dale Motels, was decided using the certiorari standard of review. | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. City of Dothangreen1 sentence1996“The certiorari standard of review is whether the law was properly applied and whether the ruling was supported by any legal evidence.” Ex parte United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 7533, 536 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1046 , 109 S.Ct. 1954 , 104 L.Ed.2d 423 (1989) (emphasis added). “[I]f there is any legal evidence to support the decision of the lower tribunal, such is conclusive on the reviewing court.” Sanders v. City of Dothan, 642 So.2d 437, 440 (Ala.1994). “[W]hen proceedings of a lower tribunal are reviewed on common-law writ of certio-rari the tribunal’s ord | 1 | 1 |
Dixie Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. United Steelworkers of Americagreen1 sentence1996“The certiorari standard of review is whether the law was properly applied and whether the ruling was supported by any legal evidence.” Ex parte United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 7533, 536 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1046 , 109 S.Ct. 1954 , 104 L.Ed.2d 423 (1989) (emphasis added). “[I]f there is any legal evidence to support the decision of the lower tribunal, such is conclusive on the reviewing court.” Sanders v. City of Dothan, 642 So.2d 437, 440 (Ala.1994). “[W]hen proceedings of a lower tribunal are reviewed on common-law writ of certio-rari the tribunal’s ord | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Colemangreen2 sentences1994See Coleman v. Coleman, 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly, 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye, 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ. 1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beverly v. Ruth's Chris Steak House
green
2 sentences2018Notably, in Martin our supreme court did not hold that an employment-related dispute would be transformed into a purely personal dispute based solely on the passage of time, a proposition this court clearly rejected in Beverly v Ruth's Chris Steak House , supra , in which this court reversed a judgment denying compensation to an employee who was injured by a co-employee who he had confronted about stealing the employer's shrimp approximately 20 minutes earlier. 2018Notably, in Martin our supreme court did not hold that an employment-related dispute would be transformed into a purely personal dispute based solely on the passage of time, a proposition this court clearly rejected in Beverly v Ruth's Chris Steak House , supra , in which this court reversed a judgment denying compensation to an employee who was injured by a co-employee who he had confronted about stealing the employer's shrimp approximately 20 minutes earlier. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
United Steelworkers, Local Union 7533 v. Dixie Electrical Manufacturing Co.
neutral
2 sentences1996“The certiorari standard of review is whether the law was properly applied and whether the ruling was supported by any legal evidence.” Ex parte United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 7533, 536 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1046 , 109 S.Ct. 1954 , 104 L.Ed.2d 423 (1989) (emphasis added). “[I]f there is any legal evidence to support the decision of the lower tribunal, such is conclusive on the reviewing court.” Sanders v. City of Dothan, 642 So.2d 437, 440 (Ala.1994). “[W]hen proceedings of a lower tribunal are reviewed on common-law writ of certio-rari the tribunal’s ord 1996“The certiorari standard of review is whether the law was properly applied and whether the ruling was supported by any legal evidence.” Ex parte United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 7533, 536 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1046 , 109 S.Ct. 1954 , 104 L.Ed.2d 423 (1989) (emphasis added). “[I]f there is any legal evidence to support the decision of the lower tribunal, such is conclusive on the reviewing court.” Sanders v. City of Dothan, 642 So.2d 437, 440 (Ala.1994). “[W]hen proceedings of a lower tribunal are reviewed on common-law writ of certio-rari the tribunal’s ord | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hill v. Frye
neutral
2 sentences1994See Coleman v. Coleman, 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly, 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye, 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ. 1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Lundy v. Lundy
neutral
1 sentence1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Anonymous v. Anonymous
green
2 sentences1994See Coleman v. Coleman, 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly, 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye, 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ. 1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State Dept. of Human Resources v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1994See Coleman v. Coleman, 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly, 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous, 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye, 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ. 1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Grimes v. Grimes
green
1 sentence1994See Coleman v. Coleman , 628 So.2d 698 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); State Dep't of Human Resources v. Kelly , 623 So.2d 738 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Anonymous v. Anonymous , 620 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993); Hill v. Frye , 603 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Grimes v. Grimes , 601 So.2d 1053 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Lundy v. Lundy , 586 So.2d 949 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Marshall Durbin & Co. v. ENVIRON. MANAGEMENT
green
1 sentence1988Marshall Durbin & Co. of Japser, Inc. v. Environmental Manag ement Commission, 495 So.2d 79 (Ala.Civ.App.1986); Smith v. Smith, 380 So.2d 897 (Ala.Civ.App.1980). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Smith v. Smith
neutral
1 sentence1988Marshall Durbin & Co. of Japser, Inc. v. Environmental Manag ement Commission, 495 So.2d 79 (Ala.Civ.App.1986); Smith v. Smith, 380 So.2d 897 (Ala.Civ.App.1980). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.